Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

You didn't say why you "need" that, but most likely - you don't. To be honest, it just sounds like a bad idea.

If the goal is to achieve a disaster recovery solution - we have a commercial feature, Warm Standby Replication for such use cases, but it still replicates data between two different RabbitMQ clusters (most likely each deployed to a different Kubernetes cluster, in a different AZ).

If you want to explore spreading a RabbitMQ cluster across Kubernetes clusters - go ahead, but we won't spend time on this.

Replies: 2 comments 2 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by michaelklishin
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@mkuratczyk
Comment options

@michaelklishin
Comment options

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
4 participants