Skip to content

Conversation

@mergify
Copy link

@mergify mergify bot commented Dec 16, 2024

If handle_tick is called before the machine has finished the upgrade process, it could receive an old overview format (stats tuple vs map). Let's ignore it and the next handle tick should be fine.

Unlikely to happen in production, detected on CI with a very low tick timeout


This is an automatic backport of pull request #12950 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

If handle_tick is called before the machine has finished the upgrade
process, it could receive an old overview format (stats tuple vs map).
Let's ignore it and the next handle tick should be fine.

Unlikely to happen in production, detected on CI with a very low tick timeout

(cherry picked from commit a97ec92)
@michaelklishin
Copy link
Collaborator

All these failures are present in v4.0.x right now (but not in main), where this PR was first merged after passing all suites.

@michaelklishin michaelklishin merged commit a552c1e into v4.0.x Dec 16, 2024
263 of 273 checks passed
@michaelklishin michaelklishin deleted the mergify/bp/v4.0.x/pr-12950 branch December 16, 2024 19:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants