Fix typo in paired_ttest_kfold_cv docs (#683)

bryant1410 · web-flow · commit 22dbece3fbfd · 2020-04-22T13:10:47.000-05:00
diff --git a/docs/sources/user_guide/evaluate/paired_ttest_kfold_cv.ipynb b/docs/sources/user_guide/evaluate/paired_ttest_kfold_cv.ipynb
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@
    "cell_type": "markdown",
    "metadata": {},
    "source": [
-    "Since $p > t$, we cannot reject the null hypothesis and may conclude that the performance of the two algorithms is not significantly different. \n",
+    "Since $p > \\alpha$, we cannot reject the null hypothesis and may conclude that the performance of the two algorithms is not significantly different. \n",
     "\n",
     "While it is generally not recommended to apply statistical tests multiple times without correction for multiple hypothesis testing, let us take a look at an example where the decision tree algorithm is limited to producing a very simple decision boundary that would result in a relatively bad performance:"
    ]

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@`
`159`	`159`	`"cell_type": "markdown",`
`160`	`160`	`"metadata": {},`
`161`	`161`	`"source": [`
`162`		`- "Since $p > t$, we cannot reject the null hypothesis and may conclude that the performance of the two algorithms is not significantly different. \n",`
	`162`	`+ "Since $p > \\alpha$, we cannot reject the null hypothesis and may conclude that the performance of the two algorithms is not significantly different. \n",`
`163`	`163`	`"\n",`
`164`	`164`	`"While it is generally not recommended to apply statistical tests multiple times without correction for multiple hypothesis testing, let us take a look at an example where the decision tree algorithm is limited to producing a very simple decision boundary that would result in a relatively bad performance:"`
`165`	`165`	`]`