Skip to content

Add support for rp235_arm_ns binaries #1839

@kilograham

Description

@kilograham
  • These are non-secure binaries that are launched by a secure counterpart
  • These are independent SDK binaries linked in their own right
  • They should be linked to run at 0x10400000 or 0x10800000 or 0x10c00000
  • There needs to be support for launching the NS binary from S code
  • The NS binary must only initialize h/w it owns
  • The secure side of the SDK must provide helper functions such as "launch NS code on core 1"
  • The secure side of the SDK should provide other secure helper functionality required to implement any pertinent SDK features on the NS side, and provide them via the bootrom secure_call mechanism

A good test case would be running Micropython under some secure firmware

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions