Skip to content

Commit 57e79c7

Browse files
author
Eric Prud'hommeaux
authored
change 2nd sentence in [#160] resolution
I believe consensus was around [Equivalence is tested with the `Term.equals()` function instead of `===` or `==`.](#160 (comment)) but I had not stuck it in the PR.
1 parent 6f34ce6 commit 57e79c7

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

index.html

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ <h2>Design elements and principles</h2>
100100
<li>Interfaces do <em>not</em> specify how instances are stored in memory.</li>
101101
<li>Interfaces mandate specific pre-defined methods such as <code>.equals()</code>.</li>
102102
<li>
103-
Interfaces are not expected to expose internal objects or return the same object from sucessive calls. Callers shoud use the `Term.equals()` function instead of `===` or `==` to test for equivalence.
103+
Interfaces are not expected to expose internal objects or return the same object from sucessive calls. Equivalence is tested with the `Term.equals()` function instead of `===` or `==`.
104104
</li>
105105
<li>
106106
Factory functions (e.g., <code>quad()</code>) or methods (e.g.,

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)