Skip to content

Commit 1161997

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #220 from react-native-community/2020-04-15-issue-management-meeting
Notes for 2020-04-15 issue management meeting
2 parents ab9c499 + 04456cc commit 1161997

File tree

1 file changed

+46
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+46
-0
lines changed
Lines changed: 46 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
1+
# 2020-04-15 React Native Issue Management Meeting
2+
3+
## Agenda:
4+
- Discuss common patterns observed in offline triage
5+
- Go through Needs: Issue Manager Attention issues
6+
- Go through Needs: Triage issues
7+
- Go through Needs: Attention issues
8+
- Discuss areas of improvement
9+
- Create action items
10+
11+
## Notes
12+
13+
- No issues flagged [Needs: Issue Manager Attention](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/labels/Needs%3A%20Issue%20Manager%20Attention) this week
14+
- Lots of issue traffic from upgrade issues to 0.62
15+
- [Type: Upgrade Issue](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/labels/Type%3A%20Upgrade%20Issue) will redirect to the [Upgrade Support repository](https://github.com/react-native-community/upgrade-support) and close it.
16+
- Action item: Add some communication in the bot tag response that they should come back if they are unable to resolve their issue due to an actual bug.
17+
- Potentially retire these: [DX: Upgrading](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/labels/DX%3A%20Upgrading), [Issue When Upgrading](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/labels/Issue%20When%20Upgrading).
18+
- COVID cadence - offline every other week.
19+
- [Needs: Verify on Latest Version](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/labels/Needs%3A%20Verify%20on%20Latest%20Version) - what's the support window? Do we tag issues on 61 now that 62 is out?
20+
- If they filed against the latest version when they opened the issue, that's fine (at least for N-1).
21+
- Do we clear "Needs: Triage" if issue looks completely good?
22+
- Facebook team would still like to look through these for prioritization
23+
- Having a label that says "this issue is good" doesn't feel quite right
24+
- Suggestion: Add "positive tags" such as "has good repro", "good description", etc.
25+
- Of note, [Issue: Author Provided Repro](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/labels/Issue%3A%20Author%20Provided%20Repro) already exists, and we should use.
26+
- Noticed that the bot is automatically applying Component/API labels
27+
- Sounds like was preexisting functionality, there was a bug, and it was fixed. Yay!
28+
- Lot of Flipper issues?
29+
- Somewhat expected as it's new to 62. Now has [a label](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/labels/Flipper).
30+
- Meeting cadence in light of COVID-19 challenges and reduced meeting bandwidth
31+
- Chris is going to send out a fresh invite (moving from Harini), moving to biweekly
32+
- Can do an offline checkin in off weeks, as we're trying to beef up offline triage anyway
33+
- 0.62 issues and Expo
34+
- Expo won't be upgraded until ~June/July so snacks are not good for reproing 0.62 issues.
35+
- This is pretty much always a problem with updates to latest version (part of why snacks aren't a requirement)
36+
- Potential concern: Will Expo fall behind with the many-version updates expected on path to TurboModules?
37+
- Tip: issues with the documentation should be labeled [Type: Docs](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/labels/Type%3A%20Docs) (will close issue)
38+
- After meeting (and small offline follow ups) triage needed is at 127
39+
40+
## Attendees
41+
42+
- Microsoft: Chris Glein (@chrisglein)
43+
- Coinbase: Ian Ownbey (@imownbey)
44+
- Expo: Charlie Cruzan (@cruzach)
45+
- SumoLogic: Jason Safaiyeh (@safaiyeh)
46+
- Facebook: Héctor Ramos (@hramos)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)