merging all conflicts

Author: react-translations-bot

src/content/blog/2023/03/16/introducing-react-dev.md

@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ Use the conditional operator (`cond ? a : b`) to render a ❌ if `isPacked` isn
 function Item({ name, isPacked }) {
   return (
     <li className="item">
-      {name} {isPacked && '✔'}
+      {name} {isPacked && '✅'}
     </li>
   );
 }
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ export default function PackingList() {
 function Item({ name, isPacked }) {
   return (
     <li className="item">
-      {name} {isPacked ? '✔' : '❌'}
+      {name} {isPacked ? '✅' : '❌'}
     </li>
   );
 }

src/content/learn/conditional-rendering.md

@@ -52,13 +52,17 @@ export default function PackingList() {
 </Sandpack>
                   
 
+<<<<<<< HEAD
 Обратите внимание, что у некоторых компонентов `Item` проп `isPacked` имеет значение `true`, вместо значения `false`. Если `isPacked={true}`, вы хотите добавить галочку(✔) к упакованным вещам.
+=======
+Notice that some of the `Item` components have their `isPacked` prop set to `true` instead of `false`. You want to add a checkmark (✅) to packed items if `isPacked={true}`.
+>>>>>>> 7d50c3ffd4df2dc7903f4e41069653a456a9c223
 
 Можно реализовать это с помощью [управляющей конструкции `if`/`else`](https://developer.mozilla.org/ru/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/if...) таким образом:
 
 ```js
 if (isPacked) {
-  return <li className="item">{name} ✔</li>;
+  return <li className="item">{name} ✅</li>;
 }
 return <li className="item">{name}</li>;
 ```
@@ -70,7 +74,7 @@ return <li className="item">{name}</li>;
 ```js
 function Item({ name, isPacked }) {
   if (isPacked) {
-    return <li className="item">{name} ✔</li>;
+    return <li className="item">{name} ✅</li>;
   }
   return <li className="item">{name}</li>;
 }
@@ -159,7 +163,7 @@ export default function PackingList() {
 В предыдущем примере вы контролировали, какое JSX дерево будет возвращено компонентом (если вообще будет!). Возможно, вы уже заметили некоторое дублирование в выводе рендера:
 
 ```js
-<li className="item">{name} ✔</li>
+<li className="item">{name} ✅</li>
 ```
 
 очень похоже на
@@ -172,7 +176,7 @@ export default function PackingList() {
 
 ```js
 if (isPacked) {
-  return <li className="item">{name} ✔</li>;
+  return <li className="item">{name} ✅</li>;
 }
 return <li className="item">{name}</li>;
 ```
@@ -187,7 +191,7 @@ return <li className="item">{name}</li>;
 
 ```js
 if (isPacked) {
-  return <li className="item">{name} ✔</li>;
+  return <li className="item">{name} ✅</li>;
 }
 return <li className="item">{name}</li>;
 ```
@@ -197,12 +201,16 @@ return <li className="item">{name}</li>;
 ```js
 return (
   <li className="item">
-    {isPacked ? name + ' ✔' : name}
+    {isPacked ? name + ' ✅' : name}
   </li>
 );
 ```
 
+<<<<<<< HEAD
 Вы можете читать это как *"если `isPacked` равно true, тогда (`?`) рендерим `name + ' ✔'`, в противном случае (`:`) рендерим `name`"*.
+=======
+You can read it as *"if `isPacked` is true, then (`?`) render `name + ' ✅'`, otherwise (`:`) render `name`"*.
+>>>>>>> 7d50c3ffd4df2dc7903f4e41069653a456a9c223
 
 <DeepDive>
 
@@ -222,7 +230,7 @@ function Item({ name, isPacked }) {
     <li className="item">
       {isPacked ? (
         <del>
-          {name + ' ✔'}
+          {name + ' ✅'}
         </del>
       ) : (
         name
@@ -265,7 +273,7 @@ export default function PackingList() {
 ```js
 return (
   <li className="item">
-    {name} {isPacked && '✔'}
+    {name} {isPacked && '✅'}
   </li>
 );
 ```
@@ -280,7 +288,7 @@ return (
 function Item({ name, isPacked }) {
   return (
     <li className="item">
-      {name} {isPacked && '✔'}
+      {name} {isPacked && '✅'}
     </li>
   );
 }
@@ -337,7 +345,11 @@ let itemContent = name;
 
 ```js
 if (isPacked) {
+<<<<<<< HEAD
   itemContent = name + ' ✔';
+=======
+  itemContent = name + " ✅";
+>>>>>>> 7d50c3ffd4df2dc7903f4e41069653a456a9c223
 }
 ```
 
@@ -357,7 +369,11 @@ if (isPacked) {
 function Item({ name, isPacked }) {
   let itemContent = name;
   if (isPacked) {
+<<<<<<< HEAD
     itemContent = name + ' ✔';
+=======
+    itemContent = name + " ✅";
+>>>>>>> 7d50c3ffd4df2dc7903f4e41069653a456a9c223
   }
   return (
     <li className="item">
@@ -401,7 +417,7 @@ function Item({ name, isPacked }) {
   if (isPacked) {
     itemContent = (
       <del>
-        {name + " ✔"}
+        {name + " ✅"}
       </del>
     );
   }
@@ -464,7 +480,7 @@ export default function PackingList() {
 function Item({ name, isPacked }) {
   return (
     <li className="item">
-      {name} {isPacked && '✔'}
+      {name} {isPacked && '✅'}
     </li>
   );
 }
@@ -502,7 +518,7 @@ export default function PackingList() {
 function Item({ name, isPacked }) {
   return (
     <li className="item">
-      {name} {isPacked ? '✔' : '❌'}
+      {name} {isPacked ? '✅' : '❌'}
     </li>
   );
 }

src/content/learn/describing-the-ui.md

@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ In this example, the JavaScript `&&` operator is used to conditionally render a
 function Item({ name, isPacked }) {
   return (
     <li className="item">
-      {name} {isPacked && '✔'}
+      {name} {isPacked && '✅'}
     </li>
   );
 }

src/content/learn/you-might-not-need-an-effect.md

@@ -408,9 +408,9 @@ function Game() {
 
 There are two problems with this code.
 
-One problem is that it is very inefficient: the component (and its children) have to re-render between each `set` call in the chain. In the example above, in the worst case (`setCard` → render → `setGoldCardCount` → render → `setRound` → render → `setIsGameOver` → render) there are three unnecessary re-renders of the tree below.
+First problem is that it is very inefficient: the component (and its children) have to re-render between each `set` call in the chain. In the example above, in the worst case (`setCard` → render → `setGoldCardCount` → render → `setRound` → render → `setIsGameOver` → render) there are three unnecessary re-renders of the tree below.
 
-Even if it weren't slow, as your code evolves, you will run into cases where the "chain" you wrote doesn't fit the new requirements. Imagine you are adding a way to step through the history of the game moves. You'd do it by updating each state variable to a value from the past. However, setting the `card` state to a value from the past would trigger the Effect chain again and change the data you're showing. Such code is often rigid and fragile.
+The second problem is that even if it weren't slow, as your code evolves, you will run into cases where the "chain" you wrote doesn't fit the new requirements. Imagine you are adding a way to step through the history of the game moves. You'd do it by updating each state variable to a value from the past. However, setting the `card` state to a value from the past would trigger the Effect chain again and change the data you're showing. Such code is often rigid and fragile.
 
 In this case, it's better to calculate what you can during rendering, and adjust the state in the event handler:
 

vercel.json

@@ -24,6 +24,11 @@
       "destination": "/learn/rendering-lists#keeping-list-items-in-order-with-key",
       "permanent": false
     },
+    {
+      "source": "/docs/lists-and-keys",
+      "destination": "/learn/rendering-lists#keeping-list-items-in-order-with-key",
+      "permanent": false
+    },
     {
       "source": "/link/invalid-hook-call",
       "destination": "/warnings/invalid-hook-call-warning",