Review Emotion Analysis

Author: pooja8748

Emotion Anaylisis/EmotionAnalysis.ipynb

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['This film very closely follows the plot of the original "classic". An all American family gets stranded in the middle of nowhere (New Mexico desert here) and are attacked by a family ravaged by nuclear radiation.I\'m no fan of the first one. I thought it was stupid, unpleasant with lousy special effects and acting. Well this one is STILL stupid but more unpleasant, the gore has been upped to an incredible degree (this was edited to get an R rating) and the acting is much better. But--that makes it harder to watch. The acting is so good that I was horrified (and not in a good way) by what I was seeing. Seeing a normal American family attacked and tortured and killed AND acting like it\'s really happening can get to you. It didn\'t scare me--it just disgusted me.Also, surprisingly, this was pretty boring. The graphic gore is in small, but powerful, doses. It\'s surrounding by boring dialogue and one endless sequence when one man wanders all over a deserted town. It\'s not creepy or chilling--just dull. It was so dull that when the violence kicked back in I was so bored it had no effect. Also a good portion of the audience walked out--in boredom.So if u liked the first one you MIGHT like this one. Otherwise--stay away. I give it a 5.']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/imdb-data-test.csv

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['In the first place, I consider it a blasphemy to remake a Wes Craven movie, even one as disgusting as "The Hills Have Eyes". In the second place, the idea of nuclear tests turning people into bloodthirsty mutants - had they used it in the \'70s - could have been one of the many movies involving fear of the government (along with "The Parallax View", "Three Days of the Condor", "All the President\'s Men" and "Capricorn One").So, they not only remade a Wes Craven movie, but they used it as an excuse to show gratuitous violence. I usually really like slasher movies, but I found nothing entertaining about this one. It was just plain gross. Kathleen Quinlan and Ted Levine should have known better than this. Avoid it.As for anything about nuclear tests and their effects, just watch "The Atomic Cafe".']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/imdb-data.csv

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+["I'm a bit dissapointed: couldn't they get Mila Kunis too to complete the holy trinity? You know, Rachel Bilson, Kristen Stewart and her ... everyone is calling them that, right? No? Ok kidding aside and back to the movie though (especially because Kristen does not really have a big part here ... not that Rachel Bilson is doing much either, just saying): this is a light and entertaining affair if you suspend your disbelief with more than a stellar cast.If you can get Samuel L. Jackson to play any part in your movie ... I'd say you are good. Doug Liman directing also helps a lot. So while I wouldn't consider this a masterpiece and full of cliches and odd character traits and choices ... you can put all those aside and just enjoy the movie ... it is possible! Just do it - otherwise it is probably better not to watch the movie at all (effects have aged quite good by the way all things considering)"]

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg.csv

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['This film tells the story of Deadpool who has to find his heart should be at, in order to get through to the woman he loves.The film does make me giggle quite a few times, especially the parachute scene which has one joke after another. It is a film that cannot be taken seriously, even though the ending tries to make it look like a film with some substance. It is more for a brainless laugh, than for an adrenaline fuelled adventure.']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2085_3.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+['This is a well-acted horror sequel. Jessica Chastain and James McAvoy add some names and class to the gig. Steven King had a minor role as a storekeeper. As in most films, it sticks to the book in some cases while it deviates in others. The special horror effects were excellent. There were too many characters to get emotionally connected to their personal drama, although they made an effort to try as they gathered their tokens.Guide: F-word. No sex or nudity.']

Emotion Anaylisis/IMDB/IMDB/test/neg/2086_3.txt

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+["This takes place in the 1920s. Nick Carraway (Toby Maguire) narrates it from a sanitarium. It's about Jay Gatsby (Leonardo DiCaprio) who is VERY wealthy and his obsession with Daisy (Carey Mulligan). The problem is she's married to someone else.The novel is great but this movie completely trashes it. It makes ill-conceived changes in the story and goes on far too long. Also it's WAY overdone. There are endless parties at Gatsby's mansion and they're shoved in your face nonstop. A few times I had to close my eyes because there was too much going on! I saw it in 2D--in 3D it must be impossible to watch. When it isn't in your face it's deadly dull and moves at a snails pace. To make matters worse Maguire is lousy. Totally blank-faced in his role. Mulligan (who can be good) was even worse! I never got a grasp on her character or motivations. On the other hand DiCaprio was great as Gatsby. He's grown into an amazing actor. Very good-looking too. But this movie is mostly concerned with visuals--not the story. It manages the impossible--it's boring and overdone at the same time! Read the book instead."]