|
| 1 | +# Multimodal Diabetes Detection Model- Using 3 Ensemble Models |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Table of Contents |
| 4 | +- [Overview](#overview) |
| 5 | +- [Use Case](#use-case) |
| 6 | +- [Benefits](#benefits) |
| 7 | +- [Dataset](#dataset) |
| 8 | +- [Models Used](#models-used) |
| 9 | +- [Usage](#usage) |
| 10 | +- [Model Performance Metrics](#model-performance-metrics) |
| 11 | +- [Future Work](#future-work) |
| 12 | +- [Contribution Guidelines](#contribution-guidelines) |
| 13 | +- [Contact Information](#contact-information) |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +## Overview |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +This project aims to develop a diabetes detection system using the Pima Indians Diabetes dataset. It leverages three ensemble models: Stacking, Soft Voting, and Hard-Soft Voting to improve the accuracy and reliability of predictions. |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +## Use Case |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +The implemented feature enhances the project by: |
| 22 | +- Improving predictive accuracy for diabetes detection. |
| 23 | +- Providing more reliable and robust predictions. |
| 24 | +- Facilitating better decision-making in healthcare applications. |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +## Benefits |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +The benefits of this feature include: |
| 29 | +- Enhanced model robustness through ensemble learning. |
| 30 | +- Increased reliability in diabetes detection. |
| 31 | +- Contribution to improved patient outcomes in healthcare applications. |
| 32 | +- A valuable resource for the data science and machine learning community. |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +## Dataset |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +The project utilizes the Pima Indians Diabetes dataset from Kaggle. Below are the paths to the dataset files: |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +- `kaggle/input/pima-indians-diabetes-database/diabetes.csv` |
| 39 | +- `kaggle/input/pimaindiansdiabetesdata/pima-indians-diabetes.data.csv` |
| 40 | +- `kaggle/input/diabetes-data-set/diabetes.csv` |
| 41 | +- `kaggle/input/pima-diabetes/pimaindians-diabetes.data.csv` |
| 42 | +- `kaggle/input/pimaindiansdiabetescsv/pima-indians-diabetes.csv` |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +## Models Used |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +1. **Stacking Model:** Combines multiple classifiers with a meta-learner for final predictions. |
| 47 | +2. **Soft Voting Model:** Averages the predicted probabilities from different models. |
| 48 | +3. **Hard-Soft Voting Model:** Integrates both hard voting (majority class) and soft voting (probability-based). |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +## Usage |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +1. Open the Jupyter notebook provided in this project. |
| 53 | +2. Load the dataset. |
| 54 | +3. Preprocess the data as needed. |
| 55 | +4. Train the ensemble models. |
| 56 | +5. Evaluate the model performance. |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +## Model Performance Metrics |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +The models are evaluated using the following metrics: |
| 61 | +- Accuracy |
| 62 | +- Precision |
| 63 | +- Recall |
| 64 | +- F1 Score |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +## Future Work |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +- Explore additional features for better model performance. |
| 69 | +- Implement more advanced ensemble techniques. |
| 70 | +- Conduct a comparative analysis with other machine learning algorithms. |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +## Contribution Guidelines |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +Contributions are welcome! Please follow these steps to contribute: |
| 75 | +1. Fork the repository. |
| 76 | +2. Create a new branch. |
| 77 | +3. Make your changes. |
| 78 | +4. Submit a pull request. |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +## Contact Information |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +For questions or feedback, please reach out to [email protected] |
| 83 | + |
0 commit comments