|
1 |
| - |
2 | 1 | # Email Spam Detection
|
3 | 2 |
|
4 |
| -This project aims to detect unwanted emails (spam) from a user's inbox. Email spam detection involves using various techniques to analyze the content, metadata, and patterns of emails to distinguish between spam and legitimate messages. |
| 3 | +This project aims to detect unwanted emails (spam) from a user's inbox. It uses a combination of **Natural Language Processing (NLP)** techniques and machine learning algorithms to analyze the content, metadata, and patterns of emails, distinguishing between spam and legitimate messages. |
| 4 | + |
5 | 5 | ## Goal
|
6 | 6 |
|
7 |
| -The goal of email spam detection is to identify and filter out unsolicited emails (spam) from a user's inbox, ensuring that only legitimate and important emails are delivered. This helps in reducing clutter, protecting users from potential phishing attacks, malware, and other malicious activities commonly associated with spam emails. |
| 7 | +The goal is to identify and filter out unsolicited emails (spam) from a user's inbox, ensuring only legitimate and important emails are delivered. This reduces clutter and protects users from phishing attacks, malware, and other malicious activities. |
| 8 | + |
8 | 9 | ## Methodology
|
9 | 10 |
|
10 |
| -Utilizing a combination of EDA techniques and machine learning algorithms, we have meticulously analyzed data to discern patterns and correlations associated with email . Key steps include data cleaning, feature engineering, and insightful visualization to extract meaningful insights. |
11 |
| -## Data Preprocessing |
| 11 | +Using a mix of **Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA)** and **NLP**, the data is analyzed to identify patterns and correlations. Key steps include: |
| 12 | +- Data cleaning |
| 13 | +- Text preprocessing through NLP |
| 14 | +- Feature engineering and insightful visualizations |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +## Data Preprocessing |
12 | 17 |
|
13 |
| -Data preprocessing steps include: |
| 18 | +Steps involved: |
14 | 19 | 1. Stop words removal
|
15 |
| -2. Lemmatization/Stemming |
16 |
| -3. Vectorization using TF-IDF |
| 20 | +2. Lemmatization/Stemming (NLP) |
| 21 | +3. Vectorization using **TF-IDF** (NLP) |
| 22 | +4. Tokenization for breaking down email content |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +## NLP Techniques Used |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +- **Tokenization**: Breaking down email texts into words |
| 27 | +- **Stemming/Lemmatization**: Reducing words to their base form |
| 28 | +- **TF-IDF**: Transforming text into numerical values based on importance |
| 29 | +- **Bag of Words**: Converting text into features for model building |
| 30 | + |
17 | 31 | ## Models Utilized
|
18 | 32 |
|
19 |
| -1. Logistic Regression |
20 |
| -2. Random Forest Regressor |
21 |
| -3. Multinomial Naive Bayes |
| 33 | +1. **Logistic Regression** |
| 34 | +2. **Random Forest Regressor** |
| 35 | +3. **Multinomial Naive Bayes** |
| 36 | + |
22 | 37 | ## Libraries Used
|
23 | 38 |
|
24 |
| -1. numpy: For efficient numerical operations |
25 |
| -2. pandas: For data manipulation and analysis |
26 |
| -3. seaborn: For visually appealing statistical graphics |
27 |
| -4. matplotlib: For comprehensive data visualization |
28 |
| -5. Sklearn: For implementing machine learning algorithms |
| 39 | +1. **numpy**: Numerical operations |
| 40 | +2. **pandas**: Data manipulation and analysis |
| 41 | +3. **nltk**: NLP toolkit for text processing |
| 42 | +4. **seaborn**: Statistical visualizations |
| 43 | +5. **matplotlib**: Data visualization |
| 44 | +6. **sklearn**: Machine learning algorithms |
| 45 | + |
29 | 46 | ## Results
|
30 |
| -1. Logistic Regression : 94% |
31 |
| -2. Random Forest Regressor : 89% |
32 |
| -3. Multinomial Naive Bayes : 96% |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +1. **Logistic Regression**: 98% accuracy |
| 49 | +2. **Multinomial Naive Bayes**: 97% accuracy |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +## Enhanced Features |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +Additional NLP-based features include: |
| 54 | +- Word frequency analysis using **nltk** and **collections.Counter** |
| 55 | +- Character, word, and sentence count analysis |
| 56 | +- Heatmap and distribution plots for word frequency and relationships |
33 | 57 |
|
34 | 58 | ## Conclusion
|
35 |
| -Through rigorous analysis and experimentation, it has been determined that Multinomial Naive Bayes model exhibit the highest predictive accuracy for Email Spam detection. |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +Through rigorous analysis and the use of advanced **NLP** techniques, the **Multinomial Naive Bayes** model yielded the highest predictive accuracy for email spam detection. |
0 commit comments