Skip to content

Commit 31aa6a7

Browse files
committed
regen known-issue-rhidp-5342 using ./modules/release-notes/single-source-release-notes.py
Signed-off-by: Nick Boldt <[email protected]>
1 parent d32ce75 commit 31aa6a7

File tree

1 file changed

+5
-4
lines changed

1 file changed

+5
-4
lines changed

modules/release-notes/ref-release-notes-known-issues.adoc

Lines changed: 5 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -7,11 +7,12 @@ This section lists known issues in {product} {product-version}.
77
[id="known-issue-rhidp-5342"]
88
== [Helm] Cannot run two RHDH replicas on different nodes due to Multi-Attach errors on the dynamic plugins root PVC
99

10-
If you are deploying {product-short} using the Helm Chart, it is currently impossible to have 2 replicas running on different cluster nodes. This might also affect the upgrade from 1.3 to 1.4.0 if the new pod is scheduled on a different node.
10+
Currently, when deploying {product-short} using the Helm Chart, two replicas cannot run on different cluster nodes. This might also affect the upgrade from 1.3 to 1.4.0 if the new pod is scheduled on a different node.
1111

12-
A possible workaround for the upgrade is to manually scale down the number of replicas to 0 before upgrading your Helm release. Or manually remove the old {product-short} pod after upgrading the Helm release. However, this would imply some application downtime.
13-
You can also leverage a Pod Affinity rule to force the cluster scheduler to run your {product-short} pods on the same node.
14-
12+
Possible workarounds for the upgrade include the following actions:
13+
* Manually scale down the number of replicas to 0 before upgrading your Helm release.
14+
* Manually remove the old {product-short} pod after upgrading the Helm release. However, this would imply some application downtime.
15+
* Leverage a Pod Affinity rule to force the cluster scheduler to run your {product-short} pods on the same node.
1516

1617
.Additional resources
1718

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)