Cursor and Windsurf

[doublecranberry]

Hi! Do you have any plans to support Cursor and Windsurf?

I played around a bit in my local ExTester fork and got my extension tests running on Linux in both Cursor and Windsurf, and they’re even integrated into our CI now.
It’s still very much a prototype - experimental, and definitely needs a lot of refactoring, but it works!
Right now, it only works fine on Linux with the latest app versions.
The main reason: I couldn’t find archive formats for Windows, only installers. For Windows, I have to manually copy the app folder to test-resources. So it is not very suitable for automation.
For Linux, the apps' archives can be downloaded via the Cursor and Windsurf APIs.

I’ve run all the tests in ExTester, and the results aren’t bad at all 😃
Windsurf
✅ 309 passing (9m)
⏳25 pending
❌6 failing
Cursor
✅ 252 passing (8m)
⏳ 23 pending
❌ 20 failing

I didn’t touch the extension install methods, page objects, locators, or existing VS Code tests.

Let me know if it makes sense to contribute this to ExTester (after a lot of refactoring and fixing tests, of course), or if I should just keep it in my local fork for now.
Not sure how useful this would be to others, maybe it’s just me who needs it 😄

[djelinek]

Hello! sorry I am late to your post here. That is a nice progress! 👏🏻

Of course feel free to open a PR and we can discuss there and find a solution how to integrate your solution. I think in these days, also other VS Code based AI editors are becoming more and more favorite 🙂

[doublecranberry]

Hi, Cursor recently removed the option to continue without logging in, which means you can't skip its onboarding flow anymore.
Because of this, I now need to copy my local user data file with the passed onboarding in the test setup.
Also, their download link was protected by Cloudflare at some point.
Supporting all of this within the ExTester framework seems difficult.

Windsurf is easier to support, but it is much less popular (we have only about 2% of users on it).