Skip to content

fix: Improve LLM prompt for better use case classification #55

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
anfredette merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2026
Merged

fix: Improve LLM prompt for better use case classification #55

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions backend/src/llm/prompts.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ def build_intent_extraction_prompt(user_message: str, conversation_history: list
- "budget is flexible" or "no budget constraint" → budget_constraint: flexible or none
- No budget mentioned → budget_constraint: moderate
- "cost-sensitive" or "cost efficiency important" → budget_constraint: strict or moderate
- "document Q&A" or "knowledge base" or "document search" → use_case: document_analysis_rag
- "RAG" or "retrieval" → use_case: document_analysis_rag
- "chatbot" or "customer service" or "conversational" → use_case: chatbot_conversational
- "summarize document" or "summarization" → use_case: summarization_short or long_document_summarization

{INTENT_EXTRACTION_SCHEMA}
"""
Expand Down