Skip to content

Commit a0cf9a0

Browse files
committed
Clarify LLM control statement in automatic extraction section
Changed 'LLM has no control' to be more accurate: - Your application's LLM can't directly control extraction - But you can configure custom extraction prompts on the memory server - The limitation is about client-side control, not configurability
1 parent fe4149f commit a0cf9a0

File tree

1 file changed

+5
-3
lines changed

1 file changed

+5
-3
lines changed

python-recipes/context-engineering/notebooks/section-3-memory/04_memory_tools.ipynb

Lines changed: 5 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -45,13 +45,15 @@
4545
"\n",
4646
"**Pros:**\n",
4747
"- ✅ Fully automatic\n",
48-
"- ✅ No LLM overhead\n",
48+
"- ✅ No LLM overhead in your application\n",
4949
"- ✅ Consistent extraction\n",
5050
"\n",
5151
"**Cons:**\n",
52-
"- ⚠️ LLM has no control\n",
52+
"- ⚠️ Your application's LLM can't directly control what gets extracted\n",
5353
"- ⚠️ May extract too much or too little\n",
54-
"- ⚠️ Can't decide what's important\n",
54+
"- ⚠️ Can't dynamically decide what's important based on conversation context\n",
55+
"\n",
56+
"**Note:** You can configure custom extraction prompts on the memory server to guide what gets extracted, but your client application's LLM doesn't have direct control over the extraction process.\n",
5557
"\n",
5658
"#### 2. Tool-Based Memory (This Notebook)\n",
5759
"\n",

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)