v7 - types not being exported by react-router

[kelvin2200]

I'm using React Router as a...

library

Reproduction

import { matchRoutes } from "react-router";

import { createBrowserHistory } from "history";


export const history = createBrowserHistory();

const routes = [];

/**
 * Bogus function
 * not used anywhere
 * needed to generate a type that we cannot import
 */
function makeInitialMatchesDummy(routes: any[]) {
	return matchRoutes(routes, history.location.pathname);
}

const initialMatches: NonNullable<ReturnType<typeof makeInitialMatchesDummy>> = [];

// exporting this type results in an error (does not happen with v6)
export type IniMatches = typeof initialMatches;

System Info

Windows 11, Vite, Yarn 4.5.3

Used Package Manager

yarn

Expected Behavior

I expect to be able to re-export any type that I can infer

Actual Behavior

[NicoLaval]

Same here, temporarily import "react-router/dist/production" instead of "react-router" to have types. But it breaks running...

[brookslybrand]

@kelvin2200

I'm not able to reproduce this. I'm wondering if it's something specific to your tsconfig file. Can you please provide a reproduction on Stackblitz or something similar?

[cjnoname]

Hi @brookslybrand ,

I hope the functions/types below can be exported from react-router as we are using them in our current code.

import { History, Listener } from "@remix-run/router/history";
import { createMemoryHistory, createBrowserHistory } from "@remix-run/router";

[brookslybrand]

These all come from history (a dependency of react-router).

I'm not sure why we were re-exporting them before/why we stopped now (maybe @brophdawg11 has some context)

I'm a little skeptical you need these though if you are already using react-router. These should be implementation details, but of course I don't know the context of what you're building

[cjnoname]

These all come from history (a dependency of react-router).

I'm not sure why we were re-exporting them before/why we stopped now (maybe @brophdawg11 has some context)

I'm a little skeptical you need these though if you are already using react-router. These should be implementation details, but of course I don't know the context of what you're building

Hey mate,

We use it for module federation. I tried importing these features directly from the history package, but it is not included as part of react-router v7

import type { Theme } from "@mui/material";
import type { History, Listener } from "@remix-run/router/history";
import { createMemoryHistory, createBrowserHistory } from "@remix-run/router";
import { createRoot } from "react-dom/client";
import App from "./App";
import { wsClient } from "./config/apollo/wsClient";
import type { User } from "./graphql/graphqlTypes";

export interface IParentProps {
  onParentNavigate?: Listener;
  defaultHistory: History;
  initialPath?: string;
  user?: User;
  theme?: Theme;
}

const mount = (
  elem: any,
  { onParentNavigate, defaultHistory, initialPath, ...rest }: IParentProps
) => {
  const childHistory =
    defaultHistory ||
    createMemoryHistory({
      initialEntries: [initialPath!]
    });

  if (onParentNavigate) {
    // update child history when parent history changes
    childHistory.listen(onParentNavigate);
  }

  // reset websocket
  wsClient.resetStore();
  const root = createRoot(elem);
  root.render(<App {...rest} />);

  return {
    // give parent a handle, when child history changes, update the parent history
    onChildNavigate: (currentHistory: History) => {
      const nextPathname = currentHistory.location.pathname;
      const currentPathname = childHistory.location.pathname;
      if (nextPathname !== currentPathname) {
        childHistory.push(nextPathname);
      }
    }
  };
};
export { mount };

if (process.env.NODE_ENV === "development") {
  const devRoot = document.querySelector("#child-root");
  if (devRoot) {
    mount(devRoot, {
      defaultHistory: createBrowserHistory()
    });
  }
}

[brophdawg11]

@kelvin2200 Can you provide a reproduction of your issue? I'm also unable to reproduce it.

One potential issue is that the history package is no longer used as of react-router 6.4 when we inlined the history implementations as an implementation detail because the data-aware router's are now the entry point for navigations. A secondary reason is to move away from window.history in preparation for moving the internals to the Navigation API in the future.

@cjnoname The deep imports from @remix-run/router/history were not official public API, and we've moved to using package.json exports in v7 to tighten up the public API surface and prevent the usage of deep imports such as this.

I think we stopped exporting the createBrowserHistory/etc methods in v7 because they're intended to be implementation details of the new createBrowserRouter alternatives. I think we still export UNSAFE_createBrowserHistory and I could probably be convinced to do the same for the other 2 histories - but I don't think we want to encourage continued usage of raw history instances so I don't think we want those to be normal public API (hence the UNSAFE_ prefix).

As for module federation usages, we released the patchRoutesOnNavigation API in v6 which helps some of those setups, so unsure if that's helpful to you. Here's a few references worth checking out

• https://remix.run/blog/fog-of-war#react-router-implementation
• https://reactrouter.com/6.28.0/routers/create-browser-router#optspatchroutesonnavigation
• https://github.com/swalker326/react-router-fog-of-war-example/

[cjnoname]

@kelvin2200 Can you provide a reproduction of your issue? I'm also unable to reproduce it.

One potential issue is that the history package is no longer used as of react-router 6.4 when we inlined the history implementations as an implementation detail because the data-aware router's are now the entry point for navigations. A secondary reason is to move away from window.history in preparation for moving the internals to the Navigation API in the future.

@cjnoname The deep imports from @remix-run/router/history were not official public API, and we've moved to using package.json exports in v7 to tighten up the public API surface and prevent the usage of deep imports such as this.

I think we stopped exporting the createBrowserHistory/etc methods in v7 because they're intended to be implementation details of the new createBrowserRouter alternatives. I think we still export UNSAFE_createBrowserHistory and I could probably be convinced to do the same for the other 2 histories - but I don't think we want to encourage continued usage of raw history instances so I don't think we want those to be normal public API (hence the UNSAFE_ prefix).

As for module federation usages, we released the patchRoutesOnNavigation API in v6 which helps some of those setups, so unsure if that's helpful to you. Here's a few references worth checking out

• https://remix.run/blog/fog-of-war#react-router-implementation
• https://reactrouter.com/6.28.0/routers/create-browser-router#optspatchroutesonnavigation
• https://github.com/swalker326/react-router-fog-of-war-example/

Hi @brophdawg11,

Thanks for helping to export UNSAFE_ functions. I will read through the documents you shared.

[kelvin2200]

@brophdawg11 the reproduction is in the code I posted.
I don't think you understand the problem, because it has nothing to do with the history implementation used.
Or maybe it does and I don't understand...
Me and probably others need the AgnosticRouteMatch type which is not being exported anywhere in react-router.

What I did in the past, was to import matchRoutes and infer AgnosticRouteMatch from its output, but that no longer works.

I am using react-router in a minimal form, in an implementation with react-relay for render-as-you-fetch patterns and preloading queries.

Furthermore, (even though this may be off-topic)... WHY did you guys turn this into a (yet another) framework?
Where's the benefit? Most of us just need a push/replace method or some basic routing stuff. Now we have to drag along an entire framework in our projects?
Cause at the moment I can only see the downsides. Some docs, examples, reasoning of the entire philosophy?
How/why should devs adopt this?

[Noyabronok]

As a workaround for AgnosticRouteMatch<string, DataRouteObject>[] | null
you can do ReturnType<typeof matchRoutes>
matchRoutes can be imported from react-router

[brophdawg11]

Apologies for the delay - I was on paternity leave at the end of the year so wasn't able to keep up with github notifications - and only say today's comment in my inbox.

@brophdawg11 the reproduction is in the code I posted.

As both Brooks and I said, we cannot reproduce it from the code you provided so we will need a working reproduction to dig further. From the error screenshot it seems like it might have something to do with your yarn setup?

I don't think you understand the problem, because it has nothing to do with the history implementation used.

Your reproduction code is using history so I didn't want to rule that out since that should no longer be used in current RR implementations.

WHY did you guys turn this into a (yet another) framework?

We didn't. We merged an existing framework (Remix) into this repository and made it available in React Router v7 as a new and completely optional approach. React Router in library mode is effectively the same as v6.

How/why should devs adopt this?

We've outlined the features the vite plugin (framework mode) provides in the upgrade guider: https://reactrouter.com/upgrading/component-routes#features

[jdnichollsc]

Hello folks, is there any way to use matchRoutes utility with the array of routes returned from the app/routes.ts file while using Framework mode?

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically closed because we haven't received a response from the original author 🙈. This automation helps keep the issue tracker clean from issues that aren't actionable. Please reach out if you have more information for us! 🙂