Skip to content

Consistent field types in metadata formats #1190

@mihai-sysbio

Description

@mihai-sysbio

We've stumbled upon an issue of handling the 'version' field of different types, and wondering if that could be made consistent; see related issue below:

to convert numeric versions to strings when generating the JSON files, and we'll have clean data from the backend

I'm thinking even further upstream, in the content repo. What do you think?

@mihai-sysbio I agree! Fixing it in the content repo would be the cleanest solution. We could ensure the data matches exactly with our Tool Metadata Schema, and then we can remove the redundant type handling in the frontend/backend.

Originally posted by @itisAliRH in research-software-ecosystem/RSEc-Atlas#6 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions