Skip to content

Independent track analysis for pure 3D tracks with XYZ hits #40

@jgalan

Description

@jgalan

Recently there was some issues with XYZ tracks reported by @DavidDiezIb , and addressed also in #39.

It is a bit strange for me that in the following code lines

auto hitsBoth = {hitsXZ, hitsYZ};

the XZ and YZ hits are combined to produce XYZ observables.

Indeed, this is likely producing XYZ observables out of XZ and YZ hits. However, the pure XYZ hits might require dedicated attention. Also, the TrackAnalysis process is becoming too wide.

I think we should favor smaller and more atomic processes that target a reduced problem.

We could for instance have TRestTrack3DAnalysisProcess that will target only pure XYZ tracks produced with pixel readouts or pure MC simulation output. This process would serve only for those events that contain pure XYZ tracks, so there should be some error output in case we find other track types inside the input event.

Also, we may think to split into TRestTrackBasicAnalysisProcess and TRestTrack2DAnalysisProcess, etc.

I think atomic processes should be favored.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions