Does `__riscv_v_intrinsic >= 1000000` imply overloaded intrinsics are supported?

[camel-cdr]

Does __riscv_v_intrinsic >= 1000000 imply overloaded intrinsics are supported?

There used to be a mention of __riscv_v_intrinsic_overloading in the rfc, but it doesn't seem to be in the spec anymore.
Can we rely on __riscv_v_intrinsic >= 1000000 when using overloaded intrinsics?

[rofirrim]

Hi @camel-cdr,

I think this assumption is safe to make.

Maybe clang should not set (or code should not rely on) the __riscv_v_intrinsic_overloading macro anymore unless there is some compatibility concern? /cc @4vtomat @topperc @kito-cheng

[4vtomat]

I think there's no compatibility issue and we can bump the version to v1.0 at the same time~

[4vtomat]

Resolved by llvm/llvm-project#116597