Skip to content

Conversation

@jordancarlin
Copy link
Contributor

The executable variable definitions were duplicated for each container type so they could be prefixed with the necessary commands to run the executable from within the container. The $RUN variable already had this command set for each container type, so use that universally instead.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 29, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 46.05%. Comparing base (7d94f86) to head (db0294a).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1219   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   46.05%   46.05%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines        4942     4942           
  Branches     1345     1345           
=======================================
  Hits         2276     2276           
  Misses       2666     2666           
Flag Coverage Δ
idlc 46.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@ThinkOpenly
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks like a recent merge introduced a conflict. Could you rebase, please?

The executable variable definitions were duplicated for each container
type so they could be prefixed with the necessary commands to run the
executable from within the container. the `$RUN` variable already had
this command set for each container type, so use that universally
instead.
@jordancarlin jordancarlin force-pushed the setup_run_duplication branch from 8ba393b to db0294a Compare October 31, 2025 17:25
@jordancarlin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like a recent merge introduced a conflict. Could you rebase, please?

Done

@ThinkOpenly ThinkOpenly added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 31, 2025
Merged via the queue into riscv-software-src:main with commit e52bf81 Oct 31, 2025
49 checks passed
@jordancarlin jordancarlin deleted the setup_run_duplication branch October 31, 2025 22:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants