Replies: 2 comments
-
KIT-217 Does the Rivetkit Cloudflare adapter use Durable Object KV or SQL? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I completely forgot about this when implementing this. Added #1187 thank! We have native SQLite support in RivetKit integrated but completely unannounced too, so we'll need to switch over anyways. PRs welcome if you want to do #1187 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
First off — huge thanks for building and maintaining RivetKit. It’s been super helpful.
While I was looking through the adapter code, I noticed the RivetKit Cloudflare adapter might be using Durable Object KV storage instead of DO SQL. Could you confirm whether it actually uses KV or SQL?
If it is using KV, two quick suggestions:
KV might only be available on paid Cloudflare plans and could affect deployment choices — it would be great to call that out in the docs.
https://developers.cloudflare.com/durable-objects/api/storage-api/
Consider switching to the Cloudflare-recommended Durable Objects SQL storage where it makes sense — that would be cheaper and more reliable for many users.
Thanks again for the awesome work
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions