How to improve tracking and counting accuracy? #785
Unanswered
rafaelgildin
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
First, let me convert it from an issue to a discussion and put it into the Q&A section. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Search before asking
Question
Based on the great video from Piotr here I generated this code which produced the output.
Based on the output it's possible to see some miscounts from the model and here's a list of the possible hypothesis followed by it's questions:
Some people don't show up with it's entire body before and after crossing the line. How to improve tracking and counting accuracy? Here I mean how to improve the model counts, consider counting other parts of the body, not just the entire body. For example, can I train the model with a dataset from heads as being count as people? Is that going to improve the acc?
How can I discover if it's a detection or tracking problem. Based on that, training the model with a custom dataset like described in the first topic, if it's a detection problem; or if it's a tracking one, changing the tracker or tunning it's parameters is going to improve it's acc?
Based on them, I greatly appreciate if you can answer with your thoughts and I'll be happy for any advice too.
Finally, I declared it as question not a bug or future request, because it envolves ultralytics library which could be the current problem too.
Additional
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions