|
| 1 | +- **Changed:** |
| 2 | + Until 8.19 term level 200 contained a sub-entry `binder_constr` |
| 3 | + (containing e.g. `forall`) and notations declared at level 200 were |
| 4 | + redirected to `binder_constr`. In 8.19 `binder_constr` was moved to |
| 5 | + level 10, keeping the redirection for notations declared at level 200. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | + `binder_constr` has now been removed with its parsing rules put |
| 8 | + directly at level 10, and notations declared at level 200 are |
| 9 | + redirected to level 10. Any right recursion in such a redirected |
| 10 | + notation is still interpreted as though it was really in right |
| 11 | + associative level 200, i.e. the right recursion is at level 200. |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | + The redirection will be removed in the future and is therefore |
| 14 | + deprecated. To keep the current behaviour, declare your notations at |
| 15 | + level 10 and any recursion at level 200. For instance, |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | + .. rocqdoc:: |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | + Reserved Notation "'exists' x .. y , p" |
| 20 | + (at level 200, x binder). |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | + becomes |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | + .. rocqdoc:: |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | + Reserved Notation "'exists' x .. y , p" |
| 27 | + (at level 10, x binder, p at level 200). |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | + Finally note that any `associativity` annotation on notations |
| 30 | + declared at level 200 are currrently ignored to avoid interfering |
| 31 | + with the redirection to left-associative level 10 (`#21671 |
| 32 | + <https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq/pull/21671>`_, by Gaëtan |
| 33 | + Gilbert). |
0 commit comments