Skip to content

Naming and message type of the topic joint_states/target #2

@JuanDelAguila

Description

@JuanDelAguila

@joaomoura24 and I have been discussing that the topic joint_states/target maybe should be renamed to joint_states/command to remain consistent with conventions in robot control. Additionally, the topic joint_states/target uses a sensor_msgs/JointState message type which is usually reserved for reading joint_states, not for commanding. Perhaps a more standard message type should be used for commanding joints such as std_msgs/Float64MultiArray.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions