@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ If there are several additional packages for numpy, there is a trillion
310310additional packages for scipy. In fact, every domain of science probably has
311311its own package and most of the examples we've been studying until now could
312312have been solved in two or three calls to a method in the relevant package.
313- But of course, it was not the goal an programming things yourself is generally
313+ But of course, it was not the goal and programming things yourself is generally
314314a good exercise if you have some spare time. The biggest difficulty at this
315315point is to find these relevant packages. Here is a very short list of packages
316316that are well-maintained, well-tested and may simplify your scientific life
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ Numpy is a very versatile library but still, it does not mean you have to use
391391it in every situation. In this chapter, we've seen some alternatives (including
392392Python itself) that are worth a look. As always, the choice belongs to you. You
393393have to consider what is the best solution for you in term of development time,
394- computation time and effort in maintenance. In one hand, if you design your
394+ computation time and effort in maintenance. On the one hand, if you design your
395395own solution, you'll have to test it and to maintain it, but in exchange,
396396you'll be free to design it the way you want. On the other hand, if you decide
397397to rely on a third-party package, you'll save time in development and benefit
0 commit comments