|
| 1 | +# Threat Model Outline for oauth2 Ruby Gem |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## 1. Overview |
| 4 | +This document outlines the threat model for the `oauth2` Ruby gem, which implements OAuth 2.0, 2.1, and OIDC Core protocols. The gem is used to facilitate secure authorization and authentication in Ruby applications. |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +## 2. Assets to Protect |
| 7 | +- OAuth access tokens, refresh tokens, and ID tokens |
| 8 | +- User credentials (if handled) |
| 9 | +- Client secrets and application credentials |
| 10 | +- Sensitive user data accessed via OAuth |
| 11 | +- Private keys and certificates (for signing/verifying tokens) |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +## 3. Potential Threat Actors |
| 14 | +- External attackers (internet-based) |
| 15 | +- Malicious OAuth clients or resource servers |
| 16 | +- Insiders (developers, maintainers) |
| 17 | +- Compromised dependencies |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +## 4. Attack Surfaces |
| 20 | +- OAuth endpoints (authorization, token, revocation, introspection) |
| 21 | +- HTTP request/response handling |
| 22 | +- Token storage and management |
| 23 | +- Configuration files and environment variables |
| 24 | +- Dependency supply chain |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +## 5. Threats and Mitigations |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +### 5.1 Token Leakage |
| 29 | +- **Threat:** Tokens exposed via logs, URLs, or insecure storage |
| 30 | +- **Mitigations:** |
| 31 | + - Avoid logging sensitive tokens |
| 32 | + - Use secure storage mechanisms |
| 33 | + - Never expose tokens in URLs |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +### 5.2 Token Replay and Forgery |
| 36 | +- **Threat:** Attackers reuse or forge tokens |
| 37 | +- **Mitigations:** |
| 38 | + - Validate token signatures and claims |
| 39 | + - Use short-lived tokens and refresh tokens |
| 40 | + - Implement token revocation |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +### 5.3 Insecure Communication |
| 43 | +- **Threat:** Data intercepted via MITM attacks |
| 44 | +- **Mitigations:** |
| 45 | + - Enforce HTTPS for all communications |
| 46 | + - Validate SSL/TLS certificates |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +### 5.4 Client Secret Exposure |
| 49 | +- **Threat:** Client secrets leaked in code or version control |
| 50 | +- **Mitigations:** |
| 51 | + - Store secrets in environment variables or secure vaults |
| 52 | + - Never commit secrets to source control |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +### 5.5 Dependency Vulnerabilities |
| 55 | +- **Threat:** Vulnerabilities in third-party libraries |
| 56 | +- **Mitigations:** |
| 57 | + - Regularly update dependencies |
| 58 | + - Use tools like `bundler-audit` for vulnerability scanning |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +### 5.6 Improper Input Validation |
| 61 | +- **Threat:** Injection attacks via untrusted input |
| 62 | +- **Mitigations:** |
| 63 | + - Validate and sanitize all inputs |
| 64 | + - Use parameterized queries and safe APIs |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +### 5.7 Insufficient Logging and Monitoring |
| 67 | +- **Threat:** Attacks go undetected |
| 68 | +- **Mitigations:** |
| 69 | + - Log security-relevant events (without sensitive data) |
| 70 | + - Monitor for suspicious activity |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +## 6. Assumptions |
| 73 | +- The gem is used in a secure environment with up-to-date Ruby and dependencies |
| 74 | +- End-users are responsible for secure configuration and deployment |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +## 7. Out of Scope |
| 77 | +- Security of external OAuth providers |
| 78 | +- Application-level business logic |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +## 8. References |
| 81 | +- [OAuth 2.0 Threat Model and Security Considerations (RFC 6819)](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6819) |
| 82 | +- [OWASP Top Ten](https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/) |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +--- |
| 85 | +This outline should be reviewed and updated regularly as the project evolves. |
| 86 | + |
0 commit comments