Why doesn't the CI use `svd2rust-regress`?

[YuhanLiin]

The CI script seems to do the exact same thing as svd2rust-regress, so I'm wondering why they're separated.

[Emilgardis]

no real reason but that we haven't gotten to it :)

Some previous discussions on this

#542 (comment)

I've previously also mentioned the possibility to use something like bors try --regress to catch changes in prs and print them as comments, with the new github cli I think we can do this easily and improve the experience.

[burrbull]

cc @Emilgardis should CI be replaced with svd2rust-regress test?

[Emilgardis]

I think it could and probably should