This repository was archived by the owner on May 28, 2025. It is now read-only.
Commit 76856ff
committed
Auto merge of rust-lang#12833 - kpreid:empty-enum-doc, r=Manishearth
Rephrase and expand `empty_enum` documentation.
* Remove incorrect claim that “wrappers around it are the conventional way to define an uninhabited type”.
* Discuss why one would use `!`, a newtype struct, or keep the enum.
* Add links to relevant documentation.
Before writing this change, I asked the community via [IRLO](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/idiomatic-definition-of-uninhabited-never-newtypes/20877) and [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Never.20type.20wrappers.20.2F.20defining.20uninhabited.20newtypes) for feedback. The broad consensus seemed to me to be that in a world where both `never_type` and `min_exhaustive_patterns` are stable and therefore available for general use, we _might_ want to `!` or newtypes of it — but it's certainly not “conventional” _yet._ Therefore, I've removed “conventional” and added a discussion of the pros and cons of different choices.
changelog: [`empty_enum`]: expanded documentation1 file changed
+33
-12
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
7 | 7 | | |
8 | 8 | | |
9 | 9 | | |
10 | | - | |
| 10 | + | |
| 11 | + | |
11 | 12 | | |
12 | | - | |
13 | | - | |
14 | | - | |
| 13 | + | |
| 14 | + | |
15 | 15 | | |
16 | 16 | | |
17 | | - | |
18 | | - | |
19 | | - | |
20 | | - | |
21 | | - | |
22 | | - | |
| 17 | + | |
| 18 | + | |
| 19 | + | |
23 | 20 | | |
| 21 | + | |
| 22 | + | |
| 23 | + | |
| 24 | + | |
| 25 | + | |
| 26 | + | |
| 27 | + | |
| 28 | + | |
| 29 | + | |
| 30 | + | |
| 31 | + | |
| 32 | + | |
| 33 | + | |
| 34 | + | |
| 35 | + | |
24 | 36 | | |
25 | 37 | | |
26 | 38 | | |
27 | | - | |
| 39 | + | |
28 | 40 | | |
29 | 41 | | |
30 | 42 | | |
31 | 43 | | |
32 | 44 | | |
33 | 45 | | |
34 | | - | |
| 46 | + | |
| 47 | + | |
| 48 | + | |
| 49 | + | |
| 50 | + | |
35 | 51 | | |
| 52 | + | |
| 53 | + | |
| 54 | + | |
| 55 | + | |
| 56 | + | |
36 | 57 | | |
37 | 58 | | |
38 | 59 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments