-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
Description
Proposal
Problem statement
Add a Pow
trait in the standard and core libraries that group all pow
traits of signed/unsigned integers
Motivating examples or use cases
There are already traits for the Add
, Sub
, Mul
, Div
and Rem
operations, thus some argue that Rust should also have a Pow
operator. There are also people out there that would love to see a Pow
trait in Rust, according to this poll
A quick GitHub search also shows quite a lot of places where people have to rely on the third-party num-traits
macro.
Solution sketch
The code itself already exists, it just needs to be moved out of the respective pow
methods to a trait impl
. We still need to see how we will deal with floats, since they have 2 exponentiation methods, powf
and powi
.
Alternatives
N/A
Links and related work
Initial Rust Internals discussion about adding a pow operation, with the consensus being that Rust shouldn't add an exponentiation operator, however several people expressed their opinion that an ACP for a Pow
operator should be made: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pow-trait-raise-to-power-operator/23340
What happens now?
This issue contains an API change proposal (or ACP) and is part of the libs-api team feature lifecycle. Once this issue is filed, the libs-api team will review open proposals as capability becomes available. Current response times do not have a clear estimate, but may be up to several months.
Possible responses
The libs team may respond in various different ways. First, the team will consider the problem (this doesn't require any concrete solution or alternatives to have been proposed):
- We think this problem seems worth solving, and the standard library might be the right place to solve it.
- We think that this probably doesn't belong in the standard library.
Second, if there's a concrete solution:
- We think this specific solution looks roughly right, approved, you or someone else should implement this. (Further review will still happen on the subsequent implementation PR.)
- We're not sure this is the right solution, and the alternatives or other materials don't give us enough information to be sure about that. Here are some questions we have that aren't answered, or rough ideas about alternatives we'd want to see discussed.