Skip to content

Conversation

@tomassedovic
Copy link

This has been discussed in multiple Libs-API meetings.

When an ACP proposes functions or traits, but they don't contain e.g. the return type of a function, it can be difficult to understand what exactly is the expected behaviour and whether the proposed name is a good match.

This has been discussed on multiple Libs-API meetings.

When an ACP proposes functions or traits, but they don't contain e.g. the return type of a function, it can be difficult to understand what exactly is the expected behaviour and whether the proposed name is a good match.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant