Update text/0000-rust-crate-ownership.md

Co-authored-by: inquisitivecrystal <[email protected]>

Author: Manishearth

text/0000-rust-crate-ownership.md

@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ Ideally, experimental crates that are published for feedback purposes will have
 
 > This crate is a functionally empty crate that exists to reserve the crate name of \[tool\]. It should not be used. 
 
-In general it is better to have an empty placeholder crate published instead of reserving the crate via yanking, so that there is a readme that helps
+In general it is better to have an empty placeholder crate published instead of reserving the crate via yanking, so that there is a readme that helps people understand why the crate is unavailable.
 
 
 ### Expatriated
@@ -155,4 +155,4 @@ The alternative here is mostly to continue as is. This will become increasingly
 
  - How should we handle expatriated crates?
  - Are there any missing categories?
- - What should the text blurbs be for the various categories? Should we be mandating a specific text blurb, or just require a general idea be communicated with some leeway?
+ - What should the text blurbs be for the various categories? Should we be mandating a specific text blurb, or just require a general idea be communicated with some leeway?