Skip to content

Add lint on large non scalar const #5248

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 15, 2020
Merged

Add lint on large non scalar const #5248

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 15, 2020

Conversation

ThibsG
Copy link
Contributor

@ThibsG ThibsG commented Mar 1, 2020

This PR adds the new lint non_scalar_const that aims to warn against const declaration of large arrays. For performance, because of inlining, large arrays should be preferably declared as static.

Note: i made this one to warn on all const arrays, whether they are in a body function or not. I don't know if this is really necessary, i could just reduce this lint to variables out of function scope.

Fixes: #400

changelog: add new lint for large non-scalar types declared as const

@JohnTitor JohnTitor added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Mar 2, 2020
@flip1995 flip1995 added the A-lint Area: New lints label Mar 3, 2020
flip1995
flip1995 requested changes Mar 3, 2020
View reviewed changes
@flip1995 flip1995 added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action from the author. (Use `@rustbot ready` to update this status) and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties labels Mar 3, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 5, 2020

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #5230) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

flip1995
flip1995 reviewed Mar 18, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@flip1995 flip1995 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM overall. The suggestion needs a small change, after that, this should be good to go.

@ThibsG ThibsG requested a review from flip1995 March 23, 2020 15:40
flip1995
flip1995 reviewed Mar 23, 2020
View reviewed changes
@flip1995 flip1995 added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action from the author. (Use `@rustbot ready` to update this status) labels Mar 23, 2020
flip1995
flip1995 requested changes Mar 23, 2020
View reviewed changes
@ThibsG ThibsG force-pushed the ConstValues branch 3 times, most recently from 6a197c0 to ab25eee Compare March 23, 2020 22:16
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 30, 2020

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #5380) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@ThibsG ThibsG requested a review from flip1995 March 30, 2020 16:04
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 30, 2020

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #5294) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 31, 2020

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #5398) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@ThibsG ThibsG force-pushed the ConstValues branch 2 times, most recently from 60ede1d to 3cedc6a Compare April 2, 2020 07:32
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 8, 2020

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #5438) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@flip1995 flip1995 added S-waiting-on-bors Status: The marked PR was approved and is only waiting bors and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties labels Apr 15, 2020
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Sorry for taking so long for the review. I don't have an excuse, just wasn't really motivated to review PRs recently.

Waiting for rustup.

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 15, 2020

📌 Commit 629cc4a has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 15, 2020

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened

@flip1995 flip1995 mentioned this pull request Apr 15, 2020
Merged
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2020
@bors
Auto merge of #5470 - flip1995:rollup-cvkuiza, r=flip1995
6651c1b 
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #5226 (Add lint for explicit deref and deref_mut method calls)
 - #5248 (Add lint on large non scalar const)
 - #5430 (Disallow bit-shifting in integer_arithmetic)
 - #5466 (large_enum_variant: Report sizes of variants)
 - #5468 (Zero single char names)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

changelog: rollup
@bors bors merged commit ceea3c6 into rust-lang:master Apr 15, 2020
@ThibsG ThibsG deleted the ConstValues branch April 15, 2020 20:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@flip1995 flip1995 flip1995 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A-lint Area: New lints S-waiting-on-bors Status: The marked PR was approved and is only waiting bors
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Warn for non-scalar const values
4 participants
@ThibsG @bors @flip1995 @JohnTitor