tests: replace "lvalue" terminology with "place".

Author: eddyb

src/test/compile-fail/regions-adjusted-lvalue-op.rs

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 // option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
 // except according to those terms.
 
-// check that we link regions in mutable lvalue ops correctly - issue #41774
+// check that we link regions in mutable place ops correctly - issue #41774
 
 struct Data(i32);
 

src/test/incremental/hashes/unary_and_binary_exprs.rs

@@ -404,9 +404,9 @@ pub fn value_cast(a: u32) -> i32 {
 
 
 
-// Change l-value in assignment ------------------------------------------------
+// Change place in assignment --------------------------------------------------
 #[cfg(cfail1)]
-pub fn lvalue() -> i32 {
+pub fn place() -> i32 {
     let mut x = 10;
     let mut y = 11;
     x = 9;
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ pub fn lvalue() -> i32 {
 #[cfg(not(cfail1))]
 #[rustc_clean(except="HirBody,MirOptimized,MirValidated", cfg="cfail2")]
 #[rustc_clean(cfg="cfail3")]
-pub fn lvalue() -> i32 {
+pub fn place() -> i32 {
     let mut x = 10;
     let mut y = 11;
     y = 9;

src/test/run-pass/issue-18514.rs

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 
 // Test that we don't ICE when translating a generic impl method from
 // an extern crate that contains a match expression on a local
-// variable lvalue where one of the match case bodies contains an
+// variable place where one of the match case bodies contains an
 // expression that autoderefs through an overloaded generic deref
 // impl.
 

src/test/run-pass/issue-18845.rs

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 // This used to generate invalid IR in that even if we took the
 // `false` branch we'd still try to free the Box from the other
 // arm. This was due to treating `*Box::new(9)` as an rvalue datum
-// instead of as an lvalue.
+// instead of as a place.
 
 fn test(foo: bool) -> u8 {
     match foo {

src/test/run-pass/method-mut-self-modifies-mut-slice-lvalue.rs

@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@
 // option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
 // except according to those terms.
 
-// Test that an `&mut self` method, when invoked on an lvalue whose
-// type is `&mut [u8]`, passes in a pointer to the lvalue and not a
+// Test that an `&mut self` method, when invoked on a place whose
+// type is `&mut [u8]`, passes in a pointer to the place and not a
 // temporary. Issue #19147.
 
 use std::slice;

src/test/run-pass/mir_drop_order.rs

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ fn main() {
         // all borrows are extended - nothing has been dropped yet
         assert_eq!(get(), vec![]);
     }
-    // in a let-statement, extended lvalues are dropped
+    // in a let-statement, extended places are dropped
     // *after* the let result (tho they have the same scope
     // as far as scope-based borrowck goes).
     assert_eq!(get(), vec![0, 2, 3, 1]);

src/test/run-pass/type-ascription.rs

@@ -40,6 +40,6 @@ fn main() {
     assert_eq!(b, 1: u16);
 
     let mut v = Vec::new();
-    v: Vec<u8> = vec![1, 2, 3]; // Lvalue type ascription
+    v: Vec<u8> = vec![1, 2, 3]; // Place expression type ascription
     assert_eq!(v, [1u8, 2, 3]);
 }

src/test/ui/issue-26093.rs

@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@
 // option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
 // except according to those terms.
 
-macro_rules! not_an_lvalue {
+macro_rules! not_a_place {
     ($thing:expr) => {
         $thing = 42;
         //~^ ERROR invalid left-hand side expression
     }
 }
 
 fn main() {
-    not_an_lvalue!(99);
+    not_a_place!(99);
 }

src/test/ui/issue-26093.stderr

@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ error[E0070]: invalid left-hand side expression
 13 |         $thing = 42;
    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^ left-hand of expression not valid
 ...
-19 |     not_an_lvalue!(99);
-   |     ------------------- in this macro invocation
+19 |     not_a_place!(99);
+   |     ----------------- in this macro invocation
 
 error: aborting due to previous error