Structured suggestion for "missing feature in unstable fn call"

When encountering a call corresponding to an item marked as unstable behind a feature flag, provide a structured suggestion pointing at where in the crate the `#![feature(..)]` needs to be written.

```
error: `foobar` is not yet stable as a const fn
  --> $DIR/const-stability-attribute-implies-no-feature.rs:12:5
   |
LL |     foobar();
   |     ^^^^^^^^
   |
help: add `#![feature(const_foobar)]` to the crate attributes to enable
   |
LL + #![feature(const_foobar)]
   |
```

Fix #81370.

Author: estebank

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/check_consts/check.rs

@@ -891,16 +891,23 @@ impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for Checker<'_, 'tcx> {
                                 // regular stability.
                                 feature == sym::rustc_private
                                     && issue == NonZero::new(27812)
-                                    && self.tcx.sess.opts.unstable_opts.force_unstable_if_unmarked
+                                    && tcx.sess.opts.unstable_opts.force_unstable_if_unmarked
                             };
                         // Even if the feature is enabled, we still need check_op to double-check
                         // this if the callee is not safe to expose on stable.
                         if !feature_enabled || !callee_safe_to_expose_on_stable {
+                            let suggestion_span =
+                                tcx.hir_crate_items(()).definitions().next().and_then(|id| {
+                                    tcx.crate_level_attribute_injection_span(
+                                        tcx.local_def_id_to_hir_id(id),
+                                    )
+                                });
                             self.check_op(ops::FnCallUnstable {
                                 def_id: callee,
                                 feature,
                                 feature_enabled,
                                 safe_to_expose_on_stable: callee_safe_to_expose_on_stable,
+                                suggestion_span,
                             });
                         }
                     }

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/check_consts/ops.rs

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 //! Concrete error types for all operations which may be invalid in a certain const context.
 
 use hir::{ConstContext, LangItem};
-use rustc_errors::Diag;
 use rustc_errors::codes::*;
+use rustc_errors::{Applicability, Diag};
 use rustc_hir as hir;
 use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
 use rustc_infer::infer::TyCtxtInferExt;
@@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ pub(crate) struct FnCallUnstable {
     /// expose on stable.
     pub feature_enabled: bool,
     pub safe_to_expose_on_stable: bool,
+    pub suggestion_span: Option<Span>,
 }
 
 impl<'tcx> NonConstOp<'tcx> for FnCallUnstable {
@@ -354,8 +355,18 @@ impl<'tcx> NonConstOp<'tcx> for FnCallUnstable {
             def_path: ccx.tcx.def_path_str(self.def_id),
         });
         // FIXME: make this translatable
+        let msg = format!("add `#![feature({})]` to the crate attributes to enable", self.feature);
         #[allow(rustc::untranslatable_diagnostic)]
-        err.help(format!("add `#![feature({})]` to the crate attributes to enable", self.feature));
+        if let Some(span) = self.suggestion_span {
+            err.span_suggestion_verbose(
+                span,
+                msg,
+                format!("#![feature({})]\n", self.feature),
+                Applicability::MachineApplicable,
+            );
+        } else {
+            err.help(msg);
+        }
 
         err
     }

tests/ui/stability-attribute/const-stability-attribute-implies-no-feature.stderr

@@ -4,7 +4,10 @@ error: `foobar` is not yet stable as a const fn
 LL |     foobar();
    |     ^^^^^^^^
    |
-   = help: add `#![feature(const_foobar)]` to the crate attributes to enable
+help: add `#![feature(const_foobar)]` to the crate attributes to enable
+   |
+LL + #![feature(const_foobar)]
+   |
 
 error: aborting due to 1 previous error