From 67a07e01cf8db40d30cea7489d78413bb3b79b00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?R=C3=A9my=20Rakic?= <remy.rakic+github@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 08:06:03 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] add test for issue 135514

---
 ...apping-impls-in-new-solver-issue-135514.rs | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tests/incremental/overlapping-impls-in-new-solver-issue-135514.rs

diff --git a/tests/incremental/overlapping-impls-in-new-solver-issue-135514.rs b/tests/incremental/overlapping-impls-in-new-solver-issue-135514.rs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..8fcc913fa3719
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/incremental/overlapping-impls-in-new-solver-issue-135514.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+// Regression test for #135514 where the new solver didn't properly record deps for incremental
+// compilation, similarly to `track-deps-in-new-solver.rs`.
+//
+// In this specially crafted example, @steffahn was able to trigger unsoundness with an overlapping
+// impl that was accepted during the incremental rebuild.
+
+//@ revisions: cpass1 cfail2
+//@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver
+
+pub trait Trait {}
+
+pub struct S0<T>(T);
+
+pub struct S<T>(T);
+impl<T> Trait for S<T> where S0<T>: Trait {}
+
+pub struct W;
+
+pub trait Other {
+    type Choose<L, R>;
+}
+
+// first impl
+impl<T: Trait> Other for T {
+    type Choose<L, R> = L;
+}
+
+// second impl
+impl<T> Other for S<T> {
+    //[cfail2]~^ ERROR conflicting implementations of trait
+    type Choose<L, R> = R;
+}
+
+#[cfg(cpass1)]
+impl Trait for W {}
+
+#[cfg(cfail2)]
+impl Trait for S<W> {}
+
+fn main() {}