@jyn514: It looks like the PR checks didn't run for some reason. Could you amend and force-push your commit to try to make them run?

I'm not very familiar with the original PR, but this looks good to me.

r? @oli-obk to make sure that I'm not missing anything.

I'm not at a computer right now, if someone could force push to my branch that would be great.

To avoid code churn, it might be a good idea to just add return true; to the beginning of the rustdoc normalize function. Once the necessary changes to trait normalization have been made, the rustdoc normalization logic could be re-enabled.

Another regression #77467 introduced: Rustdoc no long respects type aliases.

To avoid code churn, it might be a good idea to just add return true; to the beginning of the rustdoc normalize function.

I'm trying that locally right now. Will force push soonish.

@bors r+

📌 Commit 8b81bb8 has been approved by jyn514

Another regression #77467 introduced: Rustdoc no long respects type aliases.

Note: this is not a regression, and there's no type alias involved. RandomState is a struct, and explicitly declared on the impl, so rustdoc is correct here (and this change didn't affect it).

@bors p=5

This fixes a P-critical regression.

⌛ Testing commit 8b81bb8 with merge 650d9d3...

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jyn514
Pushing 650d9d3 to master...