Skip to content

Conversation

m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

@m-ou-se m-ou-se commented May 25, 2022

Before:

image

After:

image


Before this change, the compiler suggests the failure ordering is too strong and suggests choosing a weaker ordering. After this change, it instead suggests the success ordering is not strong enough, and suggests chosing a stronger one. This is more likely to be correct.

Also, before this change, the compiler suggested downgrading an invalid AcqRel failure ordering to Relaxed, without mentioning Acquire as an option.

@m-ou-se m-ou-se added A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints A-concurrency Area: Concurrency T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. A-suggestion-diagnostics Area: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix` D-papercut Diagnostics: An error or lint that needs small tweaks. labels May 25, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @nagisa

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 25, 2022
@m-ou-se m-ou-se changed the title Memory ordering diagnostics Improve memory ordering diagnostics May 25, 2022
@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented May 26, 2022

This is quite awesome and is something I encountered recently as well! Unfortunately don't have capacity to review rustc PRs right now.

r? @estebank

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned estebank and unassigned nagisa May 26, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@estebank estebank left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a couple of nitpicks, but otherwise LGTM.

@m-ou-se m-ou-se force-pushed the memory-ordering-diagnostics branch from 82b8e39 to f107923 Compare June 22, 2022 18:09
@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member Author

m-ou-se commented Jun 22, 2022

Applied your suggestions.

@bors r=estebank

Not sure how long this will stay relevant though. If #98383 gets merged, most of this lint can disappear. ^^'

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 22, 2022

📌 Commit f107923 has been approved by estebank

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 22, 2022

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 22, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#97389 (Improve memory ordering diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#97780 (Check ADT field is well-formed before checking it is sized)
 - rust-lang#98530 (compiletest: add issue number param to `known-bug`)
 - rust-lang#98556 (Fix builds on Windows (closes rust-lang#98546))
 - rust-lang#98561 (Fix spelling in SAFETY comment)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 3694e40 into rust-lang:master Jun 27, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.64.0 milestone Jun 27, 2022
@m-ou-se m-ou-se deleted the memory-ordering-diagnostics branch June 27, 2022 20:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-concurrency Area: Concurrency A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints A-suggestion-diagnostics Area: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix` D-papercut Diagnostics: An error or lint that needs small tweaks. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants