@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ async fn summarize_run(
214214        if  has_broken_benchmarks { 
215215            " - BENCHMARK(S) FAILED" 
216216        }  else if  is_regression { 
217-             " - ACTION NEEDED " 
217+             " - please read the text below " 
218218        }  else { 
219219            " - no action needed" 
220220        } , 
@@ -325,8 +325,8 @@ fn write_metric_summary(
325325        match  visibility { 
326326            DefaultMetricVisibility :: Shown  => { 
327327                message. push_str ( 
328-                     "This is a highly  reliable metric that was used to determine the \  
329-                  overall result at the top of this comment.\n \n ", 
328+                     "This is the most  reliable metric that we have; it  was used to determine the \  
329+                  overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise. \n \n ", 
330330                ) ; 
331331                write_summary_table ( & primary,  & secondary,  false ,  message) ; 
332332            } 
@@ -363,18 +363,24 @@ fn write_metric_summary(
363363
364364fn  master_run_body ( is_regression :  bool )  -> String  { 
365365    if  is_regression { 
366-         " 
367- **Next Steps**: If you can justify the \  
368-  regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with \ 
369-  `@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged` along with \ 
370-  sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions \ 
371-  please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, \ 
372-  add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, \ 
373-  and then add the `perf-regression-triaged` label to this PR.
366+         r#" 
367+ Our benchmarks found a performance regression caused by this PR. 
368+ This might be an actual regression, but it can also be just noise. 
369+ 
370+ **Next Steps**: 
371+ 
372+ - If the regression was expected or you think it can be justified, 
373+ please write a comment with sufficient written justification, and add 
374+ `@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged` to it, to mark the regression as triaged. 
375+ - If you think that you know of a way to resolve the regression, try to create 
376+ a new PR with a fix for the regression. 
377+ - If you do not understand the regression or you think that it is just noise, 
378+ you can ask the `@rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance` working group for help (members of this group 
379+ were already notified of this PR). 
374380
375381@rustbot label: +perf-regression 
376382cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance 
377- " 
383+ "#  
378384    }  else  { 
379385        " 
380386@rustbot label: -perf-regression 
0 commit comments