Add eza 0.21.2 benchmark
#2084
Merged
Add eza 0.21.2 benchmark
#2084
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Seems to be a running theme... There's an EUPL? Huh. Why remove the CoC? |
nnethercote
approved these changes
Apr 28, 2025
Member
Author
|
The CoC was licensed under a different license that we didn't yet have in this repo, so I'd have to add it to the LICENSES directory. Seemed easier to just remove the file. But if you think we shouldn't modify the repo I can add it back with the license. |
Contributor
|
Yeah, adding the license is probably better, shouldn't be that hard. |
Kobzol
force-pushed
the
benchmark-update-2025-eza
branch
from
b8f1c4a to
ab8e7d5
Compare
Member
Author
|
Ok, added the missing licenses. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
exacrate is no longer maintained, it has been replaced with the eza fork. I had to remove thelib.rsfile, because rustc-perf can't deal with crates that have both a library and a binary default target.The crate is now much larger and takes longer to compile:
Related issue: #2024