@@ -57,29 +57,18 @@ and just ask the editors to select the category.
5757[ submit_crate ] : https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704
5858
5959## Calls for Testing
60-
6160An important step for RFC implementation is for people to experiment with the
62- implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization. The following
63- RFCs would benefit from user testing before moving forward:
64-
65- <!-- Calls for Testing go here, use this format:
66- * [<RFC Topic>](<RFC URL>)
67- * [Tracking Issue](<Tracking Issue URL>)
68- * [Testing steps](<Testing Steps URL>)
69- -->
70- <!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: -->
71- <!-- * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
72- <!-- Remember to remove the `call-for-testing` label from the RFC so that the maintainer can signal for testers again, if desired. -->
73-
74- ### [ RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing )
61+ implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization.
7562
76- ### [ Rust] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing )
63+ If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear in this list, add a
64+ ` call-for-testing ` label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or
65+ guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature need testing.
7766
78- ### [ Rustup] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing )
67+ * * No calls for testing were issued this week by [ Rust] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing ) ,
68+ [ Rust language RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing ) or
69+ [ Rustup] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing ) .*
7970
80- If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear on the above list, add the new ` call-for-testing `
81- label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature
82- need testing.
71+ [ Let us know] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust/issues ) if you would like your feature to be tracked as a part of this list.
8372
8473## Call for Participation; projects and speakers
8574
@@ -120,47 +109,47 @@ If you are an event organizer hoping to expand the reach of your event, please s
120109Changes to Rust follow the Rust [ RFC (request for comments) process] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs#rust-rfcs ) . These
121110are the RFCs that were approved for implementation this week:
122111
123- <!-- Approved RFCs go here, use this format: * [Topic](URL) -->
124- <!-- or if none were approved this week, use: * *No RFCs were approved this week.* -->
125- <!-- * []() -->
126-
127- <!--
128- ### [Approved Major Change Proposals (MCP)](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html)
129- <!~~ MCPs occur infrequently, so this section is commented out by default. ~~>
130- <!~~ MCPs which have been approved or rejected this week go here, use this format: * [major change accepted|rejected] [Topic](URL) ~~>
131- -->
112+ * * No RFCs were approved this week.*
132113
133114### Final Comment Period
134115
135116Every week, [ the team] ( https://www.rust-lang.org/team.html ) announces the 'final comment period' for RFCs and key PRs
136117which are reaching a decision. Express your opinions now.
137118
138- #### [ RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period )
139- <!-- RFCs which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
140- <!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: * *No RFCs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
141- <!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
142-
143119#### Tracking Issues & PRs
144- <!-- Tracking Issues which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
145- <!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: -->
146- <!-- * *No Tracking Issues or PRs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
147- <!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
148-
149120##### [ Rust] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc )
150-
151- ##### [ Cargo] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc )
152-
153- ##### [ Language Team] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+ )
154-
155- ##### [ Language Reference] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc )
156-
157- ##### [ Unsafe Code Guidelines] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc )
121+ * [ Add (back) unsupported_calling_conventions lint to reject more invalid calling conventions] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141435 )
122+ * [ Stabilize ` if let ` guards (` feature(if_let_guard) ` )] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141295 )
123+ * [ Added ` Clone ` implementation for ` ChunkBy ` ] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138016 )
124+ * [ Make the ` dangerous_implicit_autorefs ` lint deny-by-default] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141661 )
125+ * [ Make NonZero<char > possible] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141001 )
126+ * [ Tracking Issue for nonnull_provenance] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135243 )
127+ * [ disposition: close] [ Implement operations for Wrapping<T > where Rhs = T] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140567 )
128+ * [ Split up the ` unknown_or_malformed_diagnostic_attributes ` lint] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140717 )
129+ * [ Lint on fn pointers comparisons in external macros] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134536 )
130+ * [ Specify the behavior of ` file! ` ] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134442 )
131+ * [ Document representation of ` Option<unsafe fn()> ` ] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141447 )
132+ * [ Stabilize ` feature(generic_arg_infer) ` ] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141610 )
133+ * [ Allow ` #![doc(test(attr(..)))] ` everywhere] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140560 )
134+ * [ Tracking Issue for File lock API] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130994 )
135+ * [ disposition: unspecified] [ Tracking Issue for ` unsigned_signed_diff ` ] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126041 )
136+ * [ Stabilise ` os_string_pathbuf_leak ` ] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137992 )
137+
138+ ##### [ Rust RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period )
139+ * [[ RFC] Add ` #[export_ordinal(n)] ` attribute] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3641 )
140+
141+ * No Items entered Final Comment Period this week for
142+ [ Cargo] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc ) ,
143+ [ Language Reference] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc ) ,
144+ [ Language Team] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+ ) or
145+ [ Unsafe Code Guidelines] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc ) .*
146+
147+ Let us know if you would like your PRs, Tracking Issues or RFCs to be tracked as a part of this list.
158148
159149#### [ New and Updated RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pulls )
160- <!-- New or updated RFCs go here, use this format: * [new|updated] [Topic](URL) -->
161- <!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: -->
162- <!-- * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
163- <!-- * [new|updated] []() -->
150+ * [ new] [ de-RFC: Remove unsized_locals] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3829 )
151+ * [ new] [ RFC: Procedural macros in same package as app] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3826 )
152+ * [ new] [ RFC: Allow generic impls using local trait bounds] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3821 )
164153
165154## Upcoming Events
166155
0 commit comments