Skip to content

Commit ac21cbe

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #6308 from U007D/master
Update RFC, MCP, FCP and CFT sections for TWiR-583
2 parents cb8d1ab + 783162f commit ac21cbe

File tree

1 file changed

+17
-31
lines changed

1 file changed

+17
-31
lines changed

draft/2025-01-22-this-week-in-rust.md

Lines changed: 17 additions & 31 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -81,25 +81,18 @@ Thanks to [David Mason](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704/138
8181
[submit_crate]: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704
8282

8383
## Calls for Testing
84-
8584
An important step for RFC implementation is for people to experiment with the
8685
implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization. The following
8786
RFCs would benefit from user testing before moving forward:
8887

89-
<!-- Calls for Testing go here, use this format:
90-
* [<RFC Topic>](<RFC URL>)
91-
* [Tracking Issue](<Tracking Issue URL>)
92-
* [Testing steps](<Testing Steps URL>)
93-
-->
94-
<!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: -->
95-
<!-- * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
96-
<!-- Remember to remove the `call-for-testing` label from the RFC so that the maintainer can signal for testers again, if desired. -->
97-
9888
### [RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing)
89+
* *No calls for testing were issued this week.*
9990

10091
### [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing)
92+
* *No calls for testing were issued this week.*
10193

10294
### [Rustup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing)
95+
* *No calls for testing were issued this week.*
10396

10497
If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear on the above list, add the new `call-for-testing`
10598
label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature
@@ -243,47 +236,40 @@ If you are an event organizer hoping to expand the reach of your event, please s
243236
Changes to Rust follow the Rust [RFC (request for comments) process](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs#rust-rfcs). These
244237
are the RFCs that were approved for implementation this week:
245238

246-
<!-- Approved RFCs go here, use this format: * [Topic](URL) -->
247-
<!-- or if none were approved this week, use: * *No RFCs were approved this week.* -->
248-
<!-- * []() -->
249-
250-
<!--
251-
### [Approved Major Change Proposals (MCP)](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html)
252-
<!~~ MCPs occur infrequently, so this section is commented out by default. ~~>
253-
<!~~ MCPs which have been approved or rejected this week go here, use this format: * [major change accepted|rejected] [Topic](URL) ~~>
254-
-->
239+
* [Supertrait item shadowing v2](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3624)
255240

256241
### Final Comment Period
257242

258243
Every week, [the team](https://www.rust-lang.org/team.html) announces the 'final comment period' for RFCs and key PRs
259244
which are reaching a decision. Express your opinions now.
260245

261246
#### [RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period)
262-
<!-- RFCs which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
263-
<!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: * *No RFCs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
264-
<!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
247+
* [[RFC] Target Modifiers](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3716)
265248

266249
#### Tracking Issues & PRs
267-
<!-- Tracking Issues which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
268-
<!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: -->
269-
<!-- * *No Tracking Issues or PRs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
270-
<!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
271-
272250
##### [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
251+
* [remove long-deprecated no-op attributes no_start and crate_id](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134300)
252+
* [Stabilize target_feature_11](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134090)
253+
* [Add `File already exists` error doc to `hard_link` function](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135415)
254+
* [Tracking Issue for `once_wait`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/127527)
255+
* [fix(libtest): Deprecate '--logfile'](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134283)
256+
* [Windows: remove readonly files](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134679)
257+
* [make rustc_encodable_decodable feature properly unstable](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134272)
273258

274259
##### [Cargo](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
260+
* *No Cargo Tracking Issues or PRs entered Final Comment Period this week.*
275261

276262
##### [Language Team](https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+)
263+
* *No Language Team Proposals entered Final Comment Period this week.*
277264

278265
##### [Language Reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
266+
* *No Language Reference RFCs entered Final Comment Period this week.*
279267

280268
##### [Unsafe Code Guidelines](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
269+
* *No Unsafe Code Guideline Tracking Issues or PRs entered Final Comment Period this week.*
281270

282271
#### [New and Updated RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pulls)
283-
<!-- New or updated RFCs go here, use this format: * [new|updated] [Topic](URL) -->
284-
<!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: -->
285-
<!-- * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
286-
<!-- * [new|updated] []() -->
272+
* [RFC: project goals for 2025h1](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3764)
287273

288274
## Upcoming Events
289275

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)