@@ -41,14 +41,16 @@ and just ask the editors to select the category.
4141### Project/Tooling Updates  
4242
4343### Observations/Thoughts  
44- 
44+ *  [ Evolution of Rust compiler errors] ( https://kobzol.github.io/rust/rustc/2025/05/16/evolution-of-rustc-errors.html ) 
45+ *  [ For your eyes only] ( https://bitfieldconsulting.com/posts/for-your-eyes-only ) 
4546*  [ Disable debuginfo to improve Rust compile times] ( https://kobzol.github.io/rust/rustc/2025/05/20/disable-debuginfo-to-improve-rust-compile-times.html ) 
4647
4748### Rust Walkthroughs  
4849
4950### Research  
5051
5152### Miscellaneous  
53+ *  [ Scanner- The Team Accelerating Log Analysis With Rust] ( https://filtra.io/rust/interviews/scanner-may-25 ) 
5254
5355## Crate of the Week  
5456
@@ -59,29 +61,16 @@ and just ask the editors to select the category.
5961[ submit_crate ] : https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704 
6062
6163## Calls for Testing  
62- 
6364An important step for RFC implementation is for people to experiment with the
64- implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization.  The following
65- RFCs would benefit from user testing before moving forward:
66- 
67- <!--  Calls for Testing go here, use this format:
68-     * [<RFC Topic>](<RFC URL>) 
69-         * [Tracking Issue](<Tracking Issue URL>) 
70-         * [Testing steps](<Testing Steps URL>) 
71- --> 
72- <!--  or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: --> 
73- <!--  * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* --> 
74- <!--  Remember to remove the `call-for-testing` label from the RFC so that the maintainer can signal for testers again, if desired. --> 
75- 
76- ### [ RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing )  
65+ implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization.
7766
78- ### [ Rust] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing )  
67+ If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear in this list, add a
68+ ` call-for-testing `  label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or
69+ guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature need testing.
7970
80- ### [ Rustup] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing )  
81- 
82- If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear on the above list, add the new ` call-for-testing ` 
83- label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature
84- need testing.
71+ *  * No calls for testing were issued this week by [ Rust] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing ) ,
72+   [ Rust language RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing )  or
73+   [ Rustup] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing ) .* 
8574
8675## Call for Participation; projects and speakers  
8776
@@ -115,54 +104,57 @@ If you are an event organizer hoping to expand the reach of your event, please s
115104
116105### Rust Compiler Performance Triage  
117106
118- <!--  Perf results go here --> 
107+ A relatively quiet week, likely caused by not that many PRs being merged as many contributors
108+ were at RustWeek and the All Hands event. There were several nice wins in trait solving;
109+ the benchmark suite now contains benchmarks that use the new trait solver, so we can now
110+ focus on optimizing its performance in the near future.
111+ 
112+ Triage done by ** @kobzol  ** .
113+ 
114+ Revision range: [ 718ddf66..59372f2c] ( https://perf.rust-lang.org/?start=718ddf660e6a1802c39b4962cf7eaa4db57025ef&end=59372f2c81ba74554d9a71b12a4ed7f29adb33a2&absolute=false&stat=instructions%3Au ) 
115+ 
116+ ** Summary** :
117+ |  (instructions: u )                   |  mean  |  range          |  count | 
118+ | :----------------------------------:| :-----:| :--------------:| :-----:| 
119+ |  Regressions ❌ <br  /> (primary)    |  0.6%  |  [ 0.1%, 1.8%]    |  25    | 
120+ |  Regressions ❌ <br  /> (secondary)  |  0.9%  |  [ 0.1%, 3.1%]    |  23    | 
121+ |  Improvements ✅ <br  /> (primary)   |  -0.3% |  [ -0.6%, -0.1%]  |  33    | 
122+ |  Improvements ✅ <br  /> (secondary) |  -2.2% |  [ -9.2%, -0.1%]  |  26    | 
123+ |  All ❌✅ (primary)                 |  0.1%  |  [ -0.6%, 1.8%]   |  58    | 
124+ 
125+ 2 Regressions, 5 Improvements, 3 Mixed; 3 of them in rollups
126+ 41 artifact comparisons made in total
127+ 
128+ [ Full report here] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-perf/blob/07f51987e0e9ca879a542ff365a4bac82d9c66f6/triage/2025-05-20.md ) .
119129
120130### [ Approved RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/commits/master )  
121131
122132Changes to Rust follow the Rust [ RFC (request for comments) process] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs#rust-rfcs ) . These
123133are the RFCs that were approved for implementation this week:
124134
125- <!--  Approved RFCs go here, use this format: * [Topic](URL) --> 
126- <!--  or if none were approved this week, use: * *No RFCs were approved this week.* --> 
127- <!--  * []() --> 
128- 
129- <!-- 
130- ### [Approved Major Change Proposals (MCP)](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html) 
131- <!~~ MCPs occur infrequently, so this section is commented out by default. ~~> 
132- <!~~ MCPs which have been approved or rejected this week go here, use this format: * [major change accepted|rejected] [Topic](URL) ~~> 
133- --> 
135+ *  * No RFCs were approved this week.* 
134136
135137### Final Comment Period  
136138
137139Every week, [ the team] ( https://www.rust-lang.org/team.html )  announces the 'final comment period' for RFCs and key PRs
138140which are reaching a decision. Express your opinions now.
139141
140- #### [ RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period )  
141- <!--  RFCs which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) --> 
142- <!--  or if none entered FCP this week, use: * *No RFCs entered Final Comment Period this week.* --> 
143- <!--  * [disposition: ] []() --> 
144- 
145142#### Tracking Issues & PRs  
146- <!--  Tracking Issues which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) --> 
147- <!--  or if none entered FCP this week, use: --> 
148- <!--  * *No Tracking Issues or PRs entered Final Comment Period this week.* --> 
149- <!--  * [disposition: ] []() --> 
150- 
151143##### [ Rust] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc )  
144+ *  [ Tracking Issue for AVX512 intrinsics] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111137 ) 
145+ *  [ rustdoc: on mobile, make the sidebar full width and linewrap] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139831 ) 
152146
153- ##### [ Cargo] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc )  
154- 
155- ##### [ Language Team] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+ )  
156- 
157- ##### [ Language Reference] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc )  
147+ * No Items entered Final Comment Period this week for
148+ [ Cargo] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc ) ,
149+ [ Rust RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period ) ,
150+ [ Language Reference] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc ) ,
151+ [ Language Team] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+ )  or
152+ [ Unsafe Code Guidelines] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc ) .* 
158153
159- #####  [ Unsafe Code Guidelines ] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc ) 
154+ Let us know if you would like your PRs, Tracking Issues or RFCs to be tracked as a part of this list. 
160155
161156#### [ New and Updated RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pulls )  
162- <!--  New or updated RFCs go here, use this format: * [new|updated] [Topic](URL) --> 
163- <!--  or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: --> 
164- <!--  * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* --> 
165- <!--  * [new|updated] []() --> 
157+ *  * No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* 
166158
167159## Upcoming Events  
168160
0 commit comments