diff --git a/draft/2024-10-30-this-week-in-rust.md b/draft/2024-10-30-this-week-in-rust.md
index a9a4e1fc6..ed04babe8 100644
--- a/draft/2024-10-30-this-week-in-rust.md
+++ b/draft/2024-10-30-this-week-in-rust.md
@@ -53,18 +53,19 @@ and just ask the editors to select the category.
 
 [submit_crate]: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704
 
-## [Call for Testing](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing)
+## Calls for Testing
 An important step for RFC implementation is for people to experiment with the
 implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization.  The following
 RFCs would benefit from user testing before moving forward:
 
-<!-- Calls for Testing go here, use this format:
-    * [<RFC Topic>](<RFC URL>)
-        * [Tracking Issue](<Tracking Issue URL>)
-        * [Testing steps](<Testing Steps URL>)
--->
-<!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
-<!-- Remember to remove the `call-for-testing` label from the RFC so that the maintainer can signal for testers again, if desired. -->
+### [RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing)
+* *No calls for testing were issued this week.*
+
+### [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing)
+* *No calls for testing were issued this week.*
+
+### [Rustup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing)
+* *No calls for testing were issued this week.*
 
 If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear on the above list, add the new `call-for-testing`
 label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature
@@ -109,15 +110,7 @@ If you are an event organizer hoping to expand the reach of your event, please s
 Changes to Rust follow the Rust [RFC (request for comments) process](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs#rust-rfcs). These
 are the RFCs that were approved for implementation this week:
 
-<!-- Approved RFCs go here, use this format: * [Topic](URL) -->
-<!-- or if none were approved this week, use: * *No RFCs were approved this week.* -->
-<!-- * []() -->
-
-<!--
-### [Approved Major Change Proposals (MCP)](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html)
-<!~~ MCPs occur infrequently, so this section is commented out by default. ~~>
-<!~~ MCPs which have been approved or rejected this week go here, use this format: * [major change accepted|rejected] [Topic](URL) ~~>
--->
+* *No RFCs were approved this week.*
 
 ### Final Comment Period
 
@@ -125,28 +118,31 @@ Every week, [the team](https://www.rust-lang.org/team.html) announces the 'final
 which are reaching a decision. Express your opinions now.
 
 #### [RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period)
+* *No RFCs entered Final Comment Period this week.*
 
-<!-- RFCs which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
-<!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: * *No RFCs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
-<!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
-
-#### [Tracking Issues & PRs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
+#### Tracking Issues & PRs
+##### [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
+* [disposition: merge] [Decide whether blocks inside `asm` goto should default to safe](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132078)
+* [disposition: merge] [#[inline(never)] does not work for async functions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129347)
+* [disposition: not specified] [Add LowerExp and UpperExp implementations to NonZero](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131377)
 
-<!-- Tracking Issues which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
-<!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: * *No Tracking Issues or PRs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
-<!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
+##### [Cargo](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
+* *No Cargo Tracking Issues or PRs entered Final Comment Period this week.*
 
-### [Language Reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
-<!-- Remove this section if empty>
+##### [Language Team](https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+)
+* *No Language Team Proposals entered Final Comment Period this week.*
 
-### [Unsafe Code Guidelines](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
-<!-- Remove this section if empty>
+##### [Language Reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
+* *No Language Reference RFCs entered Final Comment Period this week.*
 
-### [New and Updated RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pulls)
+##### [Unsafe Code Guidelines](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
+* *No Unsafe Code Guideline Tracking Issues or PRs entered Final Comment Period this week.*
 
-<!-- New or updated RFCs go here, use this format: * [new|updated] [Topic](URL) -->
-<!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
-<!-- * [new|updated] []() -->
+#### [New and Updated RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pulls)
+* [new] [RFC: Labeled match](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3720)
+* [new] [RFC: Never patterns](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3719)
+* [new] [[RFC] Allow packed types to transitively contain aligned types](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3718)
+* [new] [[RFC] Target Modifiers](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3716)
 
 ## Upcoming Events