You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
gh-40046: Precision issue in the normalization of a Tate series
This PR fixes the following bug:
```
sage: S.<x,y> = TateAlgebra(Qp(5), log_radii=(1,0))
sage: f = 5*x
sage: f.valuation()
0
sage: f.add_bigoh(1)
O(5 * <x/5, y>)
```
The correct answer is `(5 + O(5^2))*x + O(5 * <x/5, y>)` given that the
first summand is not absorbed by the `O(.)`.
### 📝 Checklist
<!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->
- [x] The title is concise and informative.
- [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
- [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
- [x] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [x] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation
preview.
URL: #40046
Reported by: Xavier Caruso
Reviewer(s): TristanVaccon, Vilanele
0 commit comments