You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
gh-36849: Problem with orientations of simplices in simplicial complex maps.
Problem with orientation of simplices in simplicial complex maps
<!-- ^^^^^
Please provide a concise, informative and self-explanatory title.
Don't put issue numbers in there, do this in the PR body below.
For example, instead of "Fixes#1234" use "Introduce new method to
calculate 1+1"
-->
<!-- Describe your changes here in detail -->
In rare cases, Sage incorrectly computes the chain complex map
associated to a map of simplicial complexes. The problem is that the
orientation of each simplex in the image is not correctly compared to
its actual orientation in the codomain: an edge `(f(v), f(w))` is not
compared correctly to see whether the actual simplex in the codomain is
stored as `(f(v), f(w))` or `(f(w), f(v))`.
I think that the default sorting of vertices (and hence simplices) means
that this usually doesn't come up, but it can arise when the vertices do
not have an obvious ordering. See
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/74754/chain-morphism-between-
subdivisions/ for one such case.
<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!-- If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For
example "Fixes#12345". -->
<!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it
appropriately. -->
### 📝 Checklist
<!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->
<!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it
appropriately -->
<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're
here to help! -->
<!-- Feel free to remove irrelevant items. -->
- [X] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory.
- [X] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
- [X] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
- [X] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
### ⌛ Dependencies
<!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on
- #12345: short description why this is a dependency
- #34567: ...
-->
<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're
here to help! -->
URL: #36849
Reported by: John H. Palmieri
Reviewer(s): Travis Scrimshaw
0 commit comments