Skip to content

Commit effca8b

Browse files
fix(deps): bump @oclif/core from 1.19.1 to 1.20.0
Bumps [@oclif/core](https://github.com/oclif/core) from 1.19.1 to 1.20.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/oclif/core/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/oclif/core/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](oclif/core@1.19.1...1.20.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: "@oclif/core" dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
1 parent 43ed252 commit effca8b

File tree

2 files changed

+5
-5
lines changed

2 files changed

+5
-5
lines changed

package.json

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
66
"main": "lib/index.js",
77
"bugs": "https://github.com/forcedotcom/cli/issues",
88
"dependencies": {
9-
"@oclif/core": "^1.16.4",
9+
"@oclif/core": "^1.20.0",
1010
"@salesforce/command": "^5.2.12",
1111
"@salesforce/core": "^3.31.17",
1212
"@salesforce/kit": "^1.6.1",

yarn.lock

Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -724,10 +724,10 @@
724724
is-wsl "^2.1.1"
725725
tslib "^2.3.1"
726726

727-
"@oclif/core@^1.14.1", "@oclif/core@^1.16.4", "@oclif/core@^1.18.0", "@oclif/core@^1.19.1":
728-
version "1.19.1"
729-
resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@oclif/core/-/core-1.19.1.tgz#6dba92cfb7f1412e43068db3e9716215786f85a3"
730-
integrity sha512-+LtMYQNzfLoYUcBTsWSFQ/4mqiA70XRU6tP+lDNmQQTrB5FHzDoBbyYvdjvMeS42izg78gjlN++rLUaAUCloNw==
727+
"@oclif/core@^1.14.1", "@oclif/core@^1.16.4", "@oclif/core@^1.18.0", "@oclif/core@^1.19.1", "@oclif/core@^1.20.0":
728+
version "1.20.0"
729+
resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@oclif/core/-/core-1.20.0.tgz#04a37b66cedeeb21630b91095466641bc499f706"
730+
integrity sha512-yByf6w5JOFsbIeyYEF8rSbvN4uCI/7O9lGNg0kY0N+HH6edtpCtGHe6p/4+5yPNEmGL6P8IEKi+9s0Ys774mgw==
731731
dependencies:
732732
"@oclif/linewrap" "^1.0.0"
733733
"@oclif/screen" "^3.0.2"

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)