@@ -135,8 +135,8 @@ The meaning of `auto` goes as follows:
135
135
annotation, the resource is server-side applied
136
136
137
137
We are also planning on switch the ` --server-side ` flag to ` true ` in
138
- three releases, by adding a warning message (and a blog-post) in kubectl
139
- 1.27 to let people know that the change will happen .
138
+ three releases, and while we would like to add a warning and blog-post
139
+ as early as 1.27, we have not agreed on all the terms of the change yet .
140
140
141
141
<<[ UNRESOLVED What default value for --force-conflict] >>
142
142
We're not entirely sure what the value of ` --force-conflict ` should be
@@ -149,7 +149,14 @@ but arguably a much smaller set of people.
149
149
150
150
We don't know yet, but I'll assume we don't flip the force-conflict
151
151
switch (keep it to false) in the rest of the document since that
152
- use-case is more complicated. <<[ /UNRESOLVED] >>
152
+ use-case is more complicated.
153
+ <<[ /UNRESOLVED] >>
154
+
155
+ <<[ UNRESOLVED Can we add the flag if we agree on terms before
156
+ code-freeze?] >> We know we want a warning, but since we don't know what
157
+ value of force-conflict we want yet, we don't know what the warning will
158
+ look like, we would still love to insert the warning in 1.27 if we can.
159
+ <<[ /UNRESOLVED] >>
153
160
154
161
<<[ UNRESOLVED Removal of CSA] >>
155
162
We considered removing the
0 commit comments