We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
1 parent 9970fb9 commit f05d62dCopy full SHA for f05d62d
_posts/2025-03-05-next-scala-lts-jdk.md.md
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ decision to switch to JDK 17 as the new minimum, starting with Scala 3.8 minor
11
and the subsequent new LTS which will mostly likely be Scala 3.9.
12
13
The discussion didn't uncover any compelling reason not to leave JDK 11 behind.
14
-11 is now nearly as antiquated as 8, and moving from 11 to 17 is not normally a
+11 is now nearly as antiquated as 8, and moving from 11 to 17 is not normally considered a
15
difficult upgrade for users. 17 offers useful APIs and VM features. In the JVM
16
world, requiring 17+ is already a mainstream position and is becoming more so
17
with every passing month. Also, we increase Scala's minimum so rarely, we feel
0 commit comments