Skip to content

Conversation

Philippus
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

SethTisue commented Dec 16, 2024

@Sciss @benhutchison any objections? I am not insisting this be merged. the text of the Apache 2 license is already very CLA-like in many respects

probably we should have had the CLA in place in all the modules from the start, but we didn't 🤷

if you'd like to discuss, let me know. the Scala org doesn't, to my knowledge, have any further real interest in this repo, but also, we'd rather see it stay alive than die. whether this gets merged or not is a secondary concern

cc @lrytz

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

@Philippus has reminded us that there is some prior discussion on #68

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

I just tried @Sciss's email (the one on his GitHub commits).

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

I heard back from Hanns and he said go ahead

@SethTisue SethTisue merged commit 6d100cc into scala:work Jan 6, 2025
17 checks passed
@Philippus Philippus deleted the add-scala-cla-github-action branch January 6, 2025 22:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants