Skip to content

Conversation

hamzaremmal
Copy link
Member

Closes #22754

@hamzaremmal hamzaremmal requested a review from tgodzik September 12, 2025 15:49
@hamzaremmal hamzaremmal marked this pull request as ready for review September 12, 2025 15:49
@hamzaremmal hamzaremmal requested a review from a team as a code owner September 12, 2025 15:49
@tgodzik
Copy link
Contributor

tgodzik commented Sep 12, 2025

@hamzaremmal hamzaremmal requested a review from code owner

Did you request a review from yourself? :D There is no one else in that group

@tgodzik
Copy link
Contributor

tgodzik commented Sep 12, 2025

Och, I guess that is automatic 👍

@hamzaremmal
Copy link
Member Author

@hamzaremmal hamzaremmal requested a review from code owner

Did you request a review from yourself? :D There is no one else in that group

GitHub does it automatically for any changes in the stdlib files :).
We still need to decide who else should have a say on the stdlib (aka be in that team) and we will have it as a topic for one of the upcoming core meetings. For now, I'm the stdlib master 😂 .

@hamzaremmal hamzaremmal merged commit b0f9b5e into scala:main Sep 12, 2025
43 checks passed
@hamzaremmal hamzaremmal deleted the i22754 branch September 12, 2025 18:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should we deprecate scala.annotation.elidable?
2 participants