What kind of breaking changes would it make sens to introduce in 1.0.0? #386
Closed
MateuszKubuszok
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
It seems we managed to avoid most of the changes so far, only addressing (in a backward compatible way) rename Coproduct -> Subtype since it something more people would understand. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Since 1.0.0 would set API in stone it would make sense to clean up before the release whatever we already see as clumsy or user unfriendly.
Some changes that I can think of:
withFieldConst->fieldConstorsetField,withFieldComputed->fieldComputedorupdateField(the later being inspired with lenses, since it is a very generic lens, kinda)Coproduct->Subtypesince it something more people would understandpartial.Resultname with something that works better with IDEsWhat else would be a good candidate?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions